What could have caused an EMI Filter Bead shorted by itself?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken Leong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead Emi Filter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the failure analysis of an EMI filter bead, specifically the CM3312R111R-10 from Laird Technology, which exhibited shorted leads across all measurements. Resistance tests indicated that a properly functioning ferrite bead should only show a short in a horizontal orientation. Factors such as high voltage/current surges, manufacturing errors, and shelf life issues were identified as potential causes of failure. The OEM noted a reduced shelf life from 12 months to 3 months once removed from packaging, raising concerns about moisture and oxidation affecting solderability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of EMI filter components and their specifications
  • Familiarity with failure analysis techniques in electronics
  • Knowledge of soldering processes and material properties
  • Basic principles of electrical resistance measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of tin whiskers on electronic components
  • Learn about the shelf life and storage conditions for inductive components
  • Investigate failure analysis methods for surface mount devices
  • Explore techniques for safely disassembling electronic components for inspection
USEFUL FOR

Reliability engineers, electronics failure analysts, and anyone involved in the design and testing of EMI filter components will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
Hi Guys, thanks for sharing and giving me all the valuable feedbacks and suggestions. Just to answer to some of your queries.
- The first two pics are from the same component (sorry for the confusion) and yes, it is shorted diagonally across the terminations when measured standalone after removal from the board.
- The board was conformal coated, not sure if tin whisker can be the possible cause of failure. Will further check on that.
- The OEM did mentioned about the storage issue and that's probably why they had discontinued this part.

Jim, the shadows you saw are the solder remaining after removal from the board.
Baluncore, thanks for your explanation on condensation impact on the component during storage.

P.S. How do you guys paste my comments when replying?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ken Leong said:
P.S. How do you guys paste my comments when replying?
We highlight your text, then a tab drops and we click on quote or reply. It pastes your quote in our new post box.
 
  • #33
Ken Leong said:
- The first two pics are from the same component (sorry for the confusion) and yes, it is shorted diagonally across the terminations when measured standalone after removal from the board.

so it should also be shorted between both terminations on each end as well then ?

ferrite choke.jpg
Dave
 
  • #34
davenn said:
so it should also be shorted between both terminations on each end as well then ?

View attachment 97668


Dave
Yes, Dave. All four terminations are shorted.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #35
Ken Leong said:
Yes, Dave. All four terminations are shorted.

OK

pretty crazy when there is no obvious sign of a short
Is it really a short ... 0.0 Ohms or is it just low resistance a few 10's of Ohms or similar ?
I would warm up a couple of faulty ones ( that look OK in x-ray - like the one I posted) and see if it drives off any internal moisture
and test resistance again

I just find it so hard to see how you can have a short cct without anything obvious
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes CWatters
  • #36
Ken Leong said:
Yes, Dave. All four terminations are shorted.

To Dave's question

Ahhhhh, terminology... One man's short is another man's leakage...

I always use a an analog meter for such tests. That's because on the RX1 ohms range it applies tens of milliamps to the device under test.

Wetness gives a part-scale reading determined by the electrochemistry at the fault.
A hard short circuit that we'd expect to see on those Xrays will read very near zero

A digital meter on a high ohms scale will report a low number for a few hundred ohms of something conductive like carbonized insulation.

I'll bet Dave was thinking the same thing.

Individual tin whiskers will usually get burnt away by the current from an analog multimeter on low ohms scale.

I have seen however a "tin beard" , thousands of whiskers in a clump, growing between two adjacent terminals on a barrier terminal block. It passed enough current to actuate a solenoid valve and trip the power plant .
Tin is not the only metal susceptible

http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/reference/tech_papers/2007-brusse-metal-whiskers.pdf

That's why i suggest somehow getting the top off one of the failed ones so you can see inside. A clean interior says "well, it wasn't that."

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #37
We need some idea of the circuit application / impedance. Does the bead isolate high impedance, low power signals or does it isolate low impedance, higher power supplies? The presence of intact single whiskers in a power supply situation is unlikely, but there may be a surface coating of metal due to vaporisation of many whiskers over time.

An accurate resistance measurement would be most informative.

At some point you need to use destructive testing to further the research. It is almost certain that any whiskers present will be lost if you attempt to physically expose the component's internals for visual examination. That is why in my post #20, I suggested fusing whiskers with a DC supply. By using sequentially larger charged capacitors as an energy source you might get a good estimate the mass of the whisker(s) or short involved.
 
  • #38
That is a 5 mOhm 5 amp single turn balun made of Copper and Ferrite. It it shorted out, that must be an isolation test with an Ohm meter. No debris could represent a short that would shut down that kind of power line. My guess would be contaminated part or board or the part was damaged when soldered, caused a crack. Pieces of Ferrite do not conduct much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K