What Defines the Cooling Efficiency of Motor Oils?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_Kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Fluid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors that define the cooling efficiency of motor oils, particularly focusing on the comparison between straight oils and multi-grade oils. Participants explore the properties that contribute to a fluid's ability to absorb and transfer heat, as well as the design of a testing apparatus to evaluate these properties experimentally.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that straight oils like SAE30 may cool better than multi-grade oils due to the behavior of long-chained polymers in multi-grade oils as they heat up.
  • Another participant highlights important factors for cooling efficiency, including viscosity, specific heat capacity, operating temperature, thermal conductivity, and density.
  • A question is raised about the definition of "better" in terms of cooling efficiency, prompting a discussion on the limits of performance for different fluids.
  • One participant expresses a desire to measure how well a fluid absorbs heat and transfers it to an aluminum heat sink, questioning the necessity of forced circulation in their test setup.
  • Links to external resources are shared, including values for SAE 0W30 and relevant papers on the subject, which may provide insights into experimental setups.
  • There is mention of previous findings suggesting that pure water may be an effective cooling medium for racing engines, along with a reference to the cooling properties of straight versus multi-grade oils.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes a "better" cooling fluid and the specific properties that should be measured. There is no consensus on the best approach or the definitive characteristics that define cooling efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of available specifications for thermal conductivity of motor oils, which may limit the testing and comparison of different oils. The discussion also touches on the potential issues that arise with different fluids at varying temperatures.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in automotive engineering, fluid dynamics, or those conducting experiments related to thermal management in engines.

Physics_Kid
Messages
172
Reaction score
11
hi all. i am trying to formulate some testing of different motor oils. i am looking to document which oils have better cooling properties. i read some info years back that a straight oil like SAE30 actually cools better than say a 5w30, reason being is because the multi-grade uses long chained polymers which uncoil as they get hotter which affects the cooling abilty of the oil.

but before i design my test apparatus i want to get clarity on what makes for a better cooling fluid. the specific heat is one property of a substance, but that alone to me does not define a better cooling fluid. is there a property of fluids that define endothermic and exothermic rates? in other words, if a fluid flows over a metal channel which property of fluids defines which fluid absorbs the most energy given a fixed flow rate of the fluid?

i am thinking my apparatus will be something like this. a rectangular box, ~12" on the long side, ~4" on the short side, and about ~6" tall to hold fluid around 4"-5" high. this "box" is made of 1" thick rigid foam board with a 1/4thick aluminum plate siliconed to one end of the box. on the opposite end will be an immersion heater. i will measure external temp of the aluminum vs time. i am figuring the better cooling fluid will be the one which shows the rate of temp change to be the fastest regardless of what the equilibrium temp is.

does this make sense?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Important factors will include be viscosity, specific heat capacity, operating temperature, thermal conductivity and even density.
If you want a good test I think you should consider forced circulation. Not many engines use simple convection cooling - the oil is at least 'splashed' around.
 
What's your definition of "better"?

Have a think about the limits of performance. For example water makes a good cooling media under the right conditions but it gives you other problems to solve at temperatures over 100C. What problems does oil have at different temperatures? Is oil being used for other reasons and are they impacted by heat?
 
ok,

1) well, i want to see how well the fluid absorbs heat (energy), moves it from one side to the other, and then gives it up to the aluminum heat sink on the other end (similar to the oil in an engine block). do i need to use a circulator for this test? i guess i am testing for thermal conductivity, i cannot find this spec for any motor oil and the makers won't tell me.
2) "better" - i guess my definition is the fluid that acts as the better heat sink.
 
ah, thanks much for those links, that helps me quite a bit. however, i do want to compare synthetics.

a few years back i was reading an article about pure water being best for a racing engine (i was investigating those wetter wetter products, etc), in that article it had a snippet on the order of "...and using straight oil grade vs multi-grade also helps cool an engine better".
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K