What Determines the Bonding Structure of Sulfur Trioxide?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The bonding structure of sulfur trioxide (SO3) is determined by the hybridization of the central sulfur atom, which is sp2 due to its formation of one double bond and two single bonds with oxygen atoms. This results in a formal charge distribution where sulfur has a +2 charge and one oxygen has a -1 charge, contradicting the assumption that three double bonds would yield a more stable configuration. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding formal charges and the limitations of molecular orbital (MO) theory in explaining the bonding in SO3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hybridization, specifically sp2 hybridization.
  • Knowledge of Lewis dot structures and formal charge calculations.
  • Familiarity with molecular orbital theory and its applications.
  • Basic concepts of oxidation states in compounds.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the hybridization of sulfur in various compounds, focusing on SO3.
  • Learn about formal charge calculations and their implications for molecular stability.
  • Explore molecular orbital theory and its limitations in explaining bonding in polyatomic molecules.
  • Investigate the oxidation states of oxygen in different chemical environments.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in molecular bonding theories, particularly those focusing on sulfur compounds and their structures.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Hi peeps can someone help me with this? The central atom would be sulfur correct? So that means sulfur will invoke hybridization sp2 would be use since there are 3 bonds? However when we invoke hybridization there are 2 2s electron and 2 2p electrons in the orbital(doesn't really know how to say this but basically i am trying to say they are in the same box). So when you invoke hybridization there will be 4 paired up electron and 2 unpaired electron? From what i know paired up electrons are lone pairs and its the unpaired electron that is used in bonding forming? Does that mean we can't use MO theory to explain this?

I tried searching the lewis dot structure of this molecule and found out that the sulfur forms 1 double bond and 2 single bond with the oxygen atoms. Why is that so? With 2 single bond and a double bond the sulfur would have a formal charge of +2 and oxygen +1. Ain't the molecule more stable if sulfur forms 3 double bond with oxygen since they won't have any formal charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:
I tried searching the lewis dot structure of this molecule and found out that the sulfur forms 1 double bond and 2 single bond with the oxygen atoms. Why is that so? With 2 single bond and a double bond the sulfur would have a formal charge of +2 and oxygen +1. Ain't the molecule more stable if sulfur forms 3 double bond with oxygen since they won't have any formal charge?

Are you certain that all of the atoms have a positive formal charge?
 
I meant -1 for the single bonded oxygen. A typo but still doesn't answer the question
 
That's not right.
 
Why is that so
 
Because the oxygen in SO3 is not a peroxide. Always assume that oxygen is -2 in compounds unless it is a compound with fluorine or if it is a peroxide. If it is a peroxide (oxidation number is -1), you need to rationalize an O-O bond. Can you do that in SO3?
 
No idea what you are talking about. Since oxygen has 7 electrons on it shouldn't the formal charge be -1? So can you explain the bonding in the molecule using MO theory?
 
semc said:
oxygen has 7 electrons on it shouldn't the formal charge be -1?

Where is the 7 coming from? 6 for a free atom (as if it existed, but that's what we see in periodic table) or 8 in compounds (when it gets noble gas configuration).

--
 
I meant when i drew the lewis dot for sulfur trioxide the central sulfur forms 2 dative bond with 2 oxygen and a double bond with the other one so i am talking about the one with the single bond. Why can't the sulfur form 3 double bond with all 3 oxygen atom?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K