What Determines the Bonding Structure of Sulfur Trioxide?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the bonding structure of sulfur trioxide (SO3), focusing on the hybridization of sulfur, the Lewis dot structure, and the implications of formal charges on stability. Participants explore various theories, including molecular orbital (MO) theory, to explain the bonding in the molecule.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that sulfur is the central atom and proposes sp2 hybridization due to the presence of three bonds, questioning the implications for electron pairing and bonding.
  • Another participant raises a concern about the formal charges resulting from the Lewis structure, questioning why sulfur forms one double bond and two single bonds with oxygen instead of three double bonds to avoid formal charges.
  • A later reply corrects the formal charge assertion, indicating that the single-bonded oxygen should have a formal charge of -1, but does not clarify the overall charge distribution.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the oxidation states of oxygen in SO3 and the conditions under which oxygen can have different formal charges, particularly in relation to peroxides.
  • There is a request for clarification on using MO theory to explain the bonding in SO3, indicating a desire for a deeper understanding of the molecular interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the bonding structure of sulfur trioxide, with multiple competing views on the formal charges, hybridization, and the applicability of MO theory. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing questions and corrections.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about oxidation states, the definitions of formal charge, and the application of hybridization and MO theory to the bonding structure of SO3. These aspects are not fully clarified or agreed upon by participants.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Hi peeps can someone help me with this? The central atom would be sulfur correct? So that means sulfur will invoke hybridization sp2 would be use since there are 3 bonds? However when we invoke hybridization there are 2 2s electron and 2 2p electrons in the orbital(doesn't really know how to say this but basically i am trying to say they are in the same box). So when you invoke hybridization there will be 4 paired up electron and 2 unpaired electron? From what i know paired up electrons are lone pairs and its the unpaired electron that is used in bonding forming? Does that mean we can't use MO theory to explain this?

I tried searching the lewis dot structure of this molecule and found out that the sulfur forms 1 double bond and 2 single bond with the oxygen atoms. Why is that so? With 2 single bond and a double bond the sulfur would have a formal charge of +2 and oxygen +1. Ain't the molecule more stable if sulfur forms 3 double bond with oxygen since they won't have any formal charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:
I tried searching the lewis dot structure of this molecule and found out that the sulfur forms 1 double bond and 2 single bond with the oxygen atoms. Why is that so? With 2 single bond and a double bond the sulfur would have a formal charge of +2 and oxygen +1. Ain't the molecule more stable if sulfur forms 3 double bond with oxygen since they won't have any formal charge?

Are you certain that all of the atoms have a positive formal charge?
 
I meant -1 for the single bonded oxygen. A typo but still doesn't answer the question
 
That's not right.
 
Why is that so
 
Because the oxygen in SO3 is not a peroxide. Always assume that oxygen is -2 in compounds unless it is a compound with fluorine or if it is a peroxide. If it is a peroxide (oxidation number is -1), you need to rationalize an O-O bond. Can you do that in SO3?
 
No idea what you are talking about. Since oxygen has 7 electrons on it shouldn't the formal charge be -1? So can you explain the bonding in the molecule using MO theory?
 
semc said:
oxygen has 7 electrons on it shouldn't the formal charge be -1?

Where is the 7 coming from? 6 for a free atom (as if it existed, but that's what we see in periodic table) or 8 in compounds (when it gets noble gas configuration).

--
 
I meant when i drew the lewis dot for sulfur trioxide the central sulfur forms 2 dative bond with 2 oxygen and a double bond with the other one so i am talking about the one with the single bond. Why can't the sulfur form 3 double bond with all 3 oxygen atom?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K