What Determines the Resolution Limit of a Microscope?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eoghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Microscope
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
I wonder where the resolution limit for a microscope comes out. I know that the lens can act as a circular aperture of diameter D and so a point source is diffracted in a disk of angular aperture [tex]1.22\lambda/D[/tex]
Two sources are resolved if their distance is greater than (without Abbe correction) [tex]1.22\lambda/NA[/tex]
How can I obtain this result?
I'm reading Jenkins and White and they start supposing two point sources, O on the axis of the lens and O' slightly above which form images I and I'. Each image consists of a disk and the angular separation of the disks when they are on the limit of resolution is [tex]1.22\lambda/D[/tex]
When this condition holds, the wave from O' diffracted to I has zero intensity and the extreme rays O'BI and O'AI differ in path by 1.22lambda. (B is the top point of the lens, and A is the lower point; I is the position of the image of O and lies on the lens axis) Why do they differ in path by 1.22lambda?

I also attach the image, taken from the book, of the geometry
14iq0lw.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you have to derive first the size of the Airy disk in the focal plane. The rest is geometry.
 
I tried, but I'm not sure. The distance II' is
[tex]II'=f\sin(\theta)[/tex]
where f is the distance of I from the center of the lens.
The images are resolved if
[tex]II'\geq f\frac{1.22\lambda}{D}[/tex]
If we call f' the distance between O and the center of the lens, we have
[tex]\frac{OO'}{f'}=\frac{II'}{f}[/tex]
therefore at the limit of the resolution
[tex]\frac{OO'}{f'}=\frac{f\frac{1.22\lambda}{D}}{f}[/tex]
But from the geometry we know that
[tex]f'=\frac{\frac{D}{2}}{\tan(i)}\simeq\frac{D}{2sin(i)}[/tex]
Thus, in the end
[tex]OO'=\frac{1.22\lambda}{2\sin(i)}[/tex]

Is this all right? My doubt is that this derivation is much simpler than that given in textbook...