I What Direction Do Sparks Travel from Steel-on-Steel Friction in Railroad Wheels?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Skaperen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Friction
AI Thread Summary
When a railroad engine wheel slips on the rail, sparks primarily fly in the rear direction due to the friction between the wheel and the rail. The discussion highlights that sparks are generated from fine bits of iron being rubbed off, which burn quickly in the presence of oxygen. The composition of the steel in both the wheels and rails contributes to the type and color of sparks produced, with factors like carbon content influencing their characteristics. Additionally, when two wheels rub against each other, the direction of the fine material being sheared off can vary based on their relative motion. Overall, the mechanics of friction and material properties play a crucial role in spark generation during locomotive operation.
Skaperen
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
which direction should the sparks go when two powered steel railroad wheels are forced to rub against each other in opposite directions?
when a railroad engine wheel slips on a rail as it tries to move forward i can see sparks mostly going in the rear direction. while thinking about what might happen in other situations, such as a moving engine (being pushed by its massive 100 car load, perhaps), i came to a simplistic case that seemed to also be ambiguous. if everything is steel, then two wheels rubbing against each other (both turning in the same direction, with railroad flanges out of the way, rubbing in opposite direction where they contact) should also produce sparks. but it is not clear to me which direction(s) the sparks would go.

i am assuming that steel to steel sparks are still just rubbing off fine bits of iron, due to the friction and force of movement, or the steel used in railroads has some flint-like material in alloy.

maybe this is less of a question about the direction of sparks and more of a question about the direction of fine material being rubbed off (that burns quickly).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sparks come from sand on the track that is dropped in front of the driving wheels to increase traction. Since the shear between the wheel and the rail is backwards, that is where the crushed sand, dust, and sparks are thrown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_(locomotive)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, hutchphd and hmmm27
Sparks are generated when a carbon steel is struck or scratched by flint, SiO2, which is quartz, as is sand. Pure iron is soft and dents, while high carbon steel is hard, so it flakes and will produce sparks.

Locomotive wheels are cast from steel, an alloy of iron and up to 2% carbon. The rail is a hard, medium carbon steel, with about 0.75% carbon and 0.85% manganese.

The carbon in steel is held in what is called cementite, iron carbide, Fe3C, which is a hard ceramic. After being struck, the sparks come from the burning of the iron carbide chip or flake in the oxygen atmosphere. The oxygen in the SiO2 does not seem to play a part as sparks are also generated when carbon steel is ground with carborundum, which is silicon carbide, SiC.

You can quickly identify the grade of steel by the colour and quantity of sparks produced when it is cut or ground with a hard abrasive. Are the sparks from railway wheels orange or white? Do they fly from the contact then fade, or do they fly before ending in a star-burst? Is there a mixed population produced by the different composition of the wheel and the rail?

Sand grains are a problem when handling explosives. Sparks are prevented by the use of bronze wire cutters, and wooden floors are built without steel nails.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Lnewqban and hutchphd
A theory of friction between two surfaces of similar hardness is that actual contact is between asperities (high spots). Since initial contact is point contact, the contact stress at points of contact is very high, about three times the yield stress of the material. See Case (d) in the diagram below, but without the lubricant film.
Friction.jpg

The two surfaces are moving relative to each other, and they are not separated by a lubricant film. The asperities weld at the contact areas, and are sheared off as fast as they weld. The high strain rate in the shear zone generates enough heat that sheared off particles burn up. These are the sparks that you see.
 
Skaperen said:
... maybe this is less of a question about the direction of sparks and more of a question about the direction of fine material being rubbed off (that burns quickly).
For two rotating wheels forced to rub against each other in opposite directions, I believe that any rubbed off material will go in both directions, depending on the relative tangential velocity of one wheel respect to the other.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top