What Do Smart Phones (Partially) Replace?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
188 replies · 31K views
Also I use apps for the following:
1. Scanner 2. Fax 3. USB power supply (phones with OTG function only - cf. my previous post): can use for various reasons, e.g. I use it in traveling or in hot weather at work to run small tiny portable USB fans, led lights etc., or even (as said) to charge other phones etc. 4. Safe & Sound app (in case of emergency/danger/lost etc.). 5. Web cameras (around the globe) 6. ISS app 7. NASA app 8. Other Science/update apps (e.g. Solar Kp index, PF app etc.) 9. Tools/multitools 10. Scientific calculator (not just calculator).

Total so far ~ 215+3+10=228 (unless +- partial overlappings etc. or + elaborated categories into single particular apps [e.g. as in @berkeman 's post above])

Gee! We really need/use all this stuff!? Our lives have become that complicated, ha!?

Thus the cell phone/smart phone is clearly a multi-tool!
Perhaps it's easier to iterate the things that a smart phone can't do ...
e.g. #1. vacuum cleaner
But, wait! ... You never know! ... What! Gee ... Oooouuuuuuf... Help! Noooo ... Aaaaaa...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
Engineering news on Phys.org
A chess clock (with increment)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
45129551_10212328661241895_7532245461671870464_n.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 45129551_10212328661241895_7532245461671870464_n.jpg
    45129551_10212328661241895_7532245461671870464_n.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 760
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon, QuantumQuest, russ_watters and 4 others
Demystifier said:
View attachment 233271
Well, we still need them to take pictures of them ...! (with our smartphones of course)
 
Stavros Kiri said:
Well, we still need them to take pictures of them ...! (with our smartphones of course)
That was a joke, of course! Actually I am a big fan in still using old gadgets! ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest and russ_watters
We still need to make them more mobile and self driving aka a real car phone.

590x332.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 590x332.jpg
    590x332.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 881
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: david2, QuantumQuest, anorlunda and 1 other person
jedishrfu said:
We still need to make them more mobile and self driving aka a real car phone.

View attachment 233312
Car phone or phone car? That's the big issue ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
jedishrfu said:
Your humor is killing me.
I hope you're serious
 
jedishrfu said:
We still need to make them more mobile and self driving aka a real car phone.

View attachment 233312
Stavros Kiri said:
Car phone or phone car? That's the big issue ...

This is a car phone: (attached to the car, with antenna)
https://www.automotive-fleet.com/147387/cellular-phones-ring-productivity-for-fleets

This is a phone car:
View attachment 233312
See? No joke. I was serious ...

Also, there is a big difference between 'car phone', 'cell phone' and 'smartphone' ...
Check this out:
 
Last edited:
@Stavros Kiri my post was a humorous response about features missing from today's cell phone. I imagined a phone of the future which was truly mobile and would come to the owner or follow them around.

Perhaps I should have used "real" instead of real.
 
jedishrfu said:
@Stavros Kiri my post was a humorous response about features missing from today's cell phone. I imagined a phone of the future which was truly mobile and would come to the owner or follow them around.

Perhaps I should have used "real" instead of real.
Ok. Then a 'drone phone' would be better ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
+ have we mentioned binoculars app and microscope?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
jedishrfu said:
A spy satellite or aerial archeologist via google maps app.
That requires access codes (?)
jedishrfu said:
A roving secret camera via google street view.
It won't be live

Also, how about ISS and NASA apps ...
 
Stavros Kiri said:
That requires access codes (?)

It won't be live

Also, how about ISS and NASA apps ...

Nobody said it has to be live. Google maps sometimes shows some embarrassing stuff that doesn’t get blurred out and the same goes for street view

The photos come from satellites and are released to the public and presented to us by google.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
jedishrfu said:
Nobody said it has to be live. Google maps sometimes shows some embarrassing stuff that doesn’t blurred out. And the same goes for street view

The photos come from satellites and are released to the public and presented to us by google.
But in that sense these apps are already there (via Google maps and Street view). There's also live camera apps and sites, for selected cameras and locations around the globe, accessible with your phone (or computer).
 
Stavros Kiri said:
But in that sense these apps are already there (via Google maps and Street view). There's also live camera apps and sites, for selected cameras and locations around the globe, accessible with your phone (or computer).

This is true but we see it on our phones. It’s like the tricorder of Star Trek, a somewhat improbable device, but our phones with the help of other devices and web sites on the internet can approximate its capability but in a different way. It could detect nearby life forms whereas the phone thru networking and gps can detect other phone users nearby.
 
anorlunda said:
Mr. Spock would roll over in his grave for one of our modern smartphones.

I tend to believe that what we saw on tv was limited to our ability to comprehend and that the devices of Star Trek would be totally beyond our comprehension now.
 
jedishrfu said:
Nobody said it has to be live. Google maps sometimes shows some embarrassing stuff that doesn’t get blurred out and the same goes for street view

The photos come from satellites and are released to the public and presented to us by google.
But only for public accessed areas. No private areas or properties (e.g. in street view), and even the satelite images are not clear, especially for such areas (e.g. including back yards etc.).
anorlunda said:
Mr. Spock would roll over in his grave for one of our modern smartphones.
He'd probably be reaching for his communicator and tricorder to compare and to make sure he has both with him! :biggrin::-p (in the grave) ...