What do you consider the hardest undergrad physics courses?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perceived difficulty of undergraduate physics courses, with participants identifying Electromagnetic Field Theory I and Quantum Mechanics as particularly challenging. Electrodynamics is noted for its mathematical demands, while Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics is considered easier and more enjoyable. Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics are also highlighted as difficult courses that can impact overall grades. The consensus is that Quantum Mechanics requires significant conceptual shifts in understanding the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Electromagnetic Field Theory I
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics concepts such as the Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics
  • Basic principles of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced topics in Quantum Mechanics, focusing on wave functions and CPT symmetry
  • Explore Electrodynamics and its mathematical frameworks
  • Study the principles of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics in depth
  • Investigate the applications of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators in physics, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of advanced physics courses.

Noone1982
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
What do you consider the hardest undergrad physics courses?

I'm interested to see what people view on easiest to hardest
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard at the time you were taking it, or still hard even though you know it now :P
If its the latter, I guess it would only be fair to state only senior level courses.
 
The course I had the most problems passing was electromagnetic field theory I. At the time I had major problems getting a feel for the physical picture, so it felt more as a course in pure mathematics.

Easies was the course in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, that one was also the one I enjoyed the most.
 
I think quantum mechanics would have to be regarded as the hardest, at least on a conceptual level, because you have to make major changes in the way you view the Universe and we have so few quantum referents in the "real world."
 
i read some stuff about quantum mechanics it's quite weird, with particles borrwing energy and there's a very very very small probability that u could actually walk through walls...
erm does anyone know what this thing is under my user name saying "warn 0%" with 5 pink boxes??
i think I am going to go into planetary and space physics i don't know many other fields, heard something about bose-einstein condensation like supercondutors and fluids, is that a field of research?
 
Last edited:
Tide said:
I think quantum mechanics would have to be regarded as the hardest, at least on a conceptual level, because you have to make major changes in the way you view the Universe and we have so few quantum referents in the "real world."

That wasn't nearly as hard for me as that damned electrodynamics course I had to take. Even though ED is conceptually easy to grasp for the most part it also is really demanding on the mathematical side unlike intro level QM.
 
Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics was the grade point buster where I went to school.
 
relativity/tensors(if the tensors aren't taught right.
 
I think quantum mechanics would have to be regarded as the hardest, at least on a conceptual level, because you have to make major changes in the way you view the Universe and we have so few quantum referents in the "real world."

And what if you have been reading popular books on quantum mechanics when you were a child, so you are cognizant of such concepts such as the Uncertainty Principle, collapse of the wave function, CPT symmetry, etc..?
 
  • #10
Simfishy said:
And what if you have been reading popular books on quantum mechanics when you were a child, so you are cognizant of such concepts such as the Uncertainty Principle, collapse of the wave function, CPT symmetry, etc..?

Doesn't matter. Popular science books lack all of the mathematical language and depth of theory found in a QM course. Explaining the consequences or properties of a wave equation to someone who has not even taken a calculus course is totally useless.
 
  • #11
Simfishy said:
And what if you have been reading popular books on quantum mechanics when you were a child, so you are cognizant of such concepts such as the Uncertainty Principle, collapse of the wave function, CPT symmetry, etc..?

In addition to Maxwell's comments, I'll note that the answer obviously depends on the individual so specific instances such as yours aren't particularly illuminating in the context of a general discussion. I have yet to experience being in two places at once but I have doubt it would be interesting! :)
 
  • #12
Langrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Probably because it was taught by a crazy Russian professor who did appear to give us notes in something resembling Russian. Fortunately no one else had a clue either and some serious grade boundary moving went on.
 
  • #13
I'm glad to hear that someone else had problems with Analytical mechanics, I'm doing that now and I'm having a hell of a time understanding the derivations of most of the stuff, which sucks since i'll have an oral exam which means plenty of derivations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
778
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K