What do you think about the Mac G5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattius_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mac
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Apple Mac G5, highlighting its performance and design criticisms. Users note that while the G5 promises impressive speeds, particularly with future 3GHz models, it lags behind PCs in gaming performance due to a lack of native game support. Concerns about manipulated benchmark results by Apple are raised, particularly regarding comparisons with other operating systems like Redhat and SUSE Linux. Additionally, users mention stability issues in video editing applications, contradicting the common perception of Macs as reliable systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of computer hardware specifications, particularly CPU performance.
  • Familiarity with operating systems, specifically macOS and Linux distributions like Redhat and SUSE.
  • Knowledge of benchmarking methodologies and their implications on performance comparisons.
  • Awareness of the gaming landscape and platform-specific game development trends.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of CPU architecture on gaming performance, focusing on Intel and Apple Silicon.
  • Explore independent benchmarking tools and methodologies for fair performance comparisons.
  • Investigate the advantages and disadvantages of macOS versus Linux for video editing tasks.
  • Learn about the evolution of gaming support on macOS and strategies for improving game availability.
USEFUL FOR

PC gamers, video editors, software developers, and technology enthusiasts interested in comparing Apple and PC performance metrics.

Mattius_
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
http://www.apple.com/powermac/video/

speaks for itself...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
As a mac user, I think the computer itself looks ugly. IMHO.

Plenty fast tho, with promises of 3ghz in 12 months...looks like apple is fighting back. PCs are still far better for games tho, simply because games are usually made for them first, then ported to the mac, if they are ported at all.

Gaming? Buy a pc. Anything else? Go getcha a mac
 
Apple's claims to the contrary, Macs are still far behind pc's in performance. In recent years, Apple has become quite good at manipulating tests in its favor.

Its nice to see a new product from them (long time since the last one) but they have a long way to go to become relevant again.
 
I won't disagree with that, Apple does slant results...

just like other mfcs do. There will never be a day that I trust ANY mfc who says their own product is better than another mfc's offering. Wait for independent tests, I say.
 
Mac severly manipulated their test restults. They used different codecs in the betchmarking programs and turned off hyperthreading on the Intel, among other things. Here is the report written by VeriTest (company that did the benchmark): http://www.veritest.com/clients/reports/apple/apple_performance.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's really interesting. They also used a single processor in the Dual Dell the G5 and used OSX up against Redhat when it would seem that they could have used SUSE linux on each machine for a more direct comparison of hardware specific power. Although they did use less memory in the G5 which seems weird. It was a prototype system though.

I don't use Macs personally but from comments from friends that use them for video editing, apart from the fact that in their industry you just don't use any other platform (for small stuff anyway), they run into some fairly significant crashing problems too. I always thought that stability was supposed to be one of the bonuses of the mac. Prices have dropped a fair bit recently so maybe they will become more popular.

If only they ditched the single button mouse.

Raavin :)
 
Last edited:
Go getcha a mac

I disagree. I use a Mac, but for "everything else besides games", is like saying Mac rules at everything.

PC seems to be popular for programming.


I mean, you would have no problem finding compilers that are easy to use without use of the command line or need to compile it yourself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
90K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
7K