What do you think about this T-Shirt?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taturana
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a T-shirt design featuring mathematical concepts, specifically the Taylor series and Laplace transform. Participants explore alternative equations and expressions that could be used, as well as share their opinions on the design and humor associated with it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest replacing the Taylor series with other mathematical expressions, such as integrals or the sine function.
  • One participant questions the necessity of changing the original design, suggesting that the Laplace transform is already a complex enough concept.
  • Another participant proposes incorporating convergent sequences into the design as a potential alternative.
  • Some express enjoyment of the T-shirt and share links to similar designs, while others critique the humor and math presented in XKCD comics.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the romantic nature of historical mathematicians, comparing Pierre LaPlace and William Hamilton.
  • Concerns are raised about the readability of Comic Sans font in academic settings, with some participants defending its use in comics.
  • Participants express varying opinions on the appropriateness of the T-shirt design and its mathematical accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the T-shirt design and the mathematical concepts involved. There is no consensus on whether to change the equation or what alternative might be better.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the math in the Laplace transform and the appropriateness of the humor in the design. The discussion also touches on subjective preferences regarding font readability and personal taste in comic styles.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical humor, T-shirt designs featuring math concepts, or discussions about the intersection of mathematics and popular culture may find this thread engaging.

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3848/57533257.png

Do you suggest another equation to put on the bottom instead of Taylor series? Any with integrals and complicated things? xD
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you could change cos to sin
 
what said:
you could change cos to sin

hum... why?
 
<heart|heart>=?... :biggrin:
 
Why would you want anything else? Unless we know for what purpose you're doing this I doubt we'd be able to improve on your idea. To be honest I don't see the need to replace the xkcd's version's Laplace transform with your Taylor series. If you want something complicated with integrals and such why not use the official version that has integrals and such?

Anyway one idea which I have no idea which is what you're looking for or not is to perhaps mix in something about convergent sequences as most of the other examples seem to be tools from intro calculus and linear algebra. Something like:
\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{f(\heartsuit^n)}{e^n} \to ?
 
I like this t-shirt.

t005.jpg

http://www.instantattitudes.com/shirts/t005.html

The answer is my birthday in day of year format (except in leap years).
 
So if love is negative...

Does real love exist?
 
BobG said:
I like this t-shirt.

t005.jpg

http://www.instantattitudes.com/shirts/t005.html

The answer is my birthday in day of year format (except in leap years).

The link is not working...

I changed it and now it's like the original version now look:

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/34/58306590.png

The math is correct in the Laplace transform, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taturana said:
The math is correct in the Laplace transform, right?

Positives: Pierre LaPlace is the patron saint of math teachers, having originated the phrase: "It is therefore obvious that..." while completely omitting all the steps that might actually make it obvious.

Negatives: Pierre LaPlace wasn't very romantic. William Hamilton was much more romantic. On a moonlit stroll with his wife, he carved into the stone of the Brougham Bridge: i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = -1
 
  • #10
It looks like a very comfortable t-shirt, although having an animal might cause it to collect pet hair whilst laying on the couch.
 
  • #11
MotoH said:
It looks like a very comfortable t-shirt, although having an animal might cause it to collect pet hair whilst laying on the couch.

There's no animals on either shirt! Quit hallucinating!
 
  • #12
Who dares critique XKCD!?


(You can buy the T http://store.xkcd.com/" .)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
I own the shirt, or at least the one put out by XKCD. It's cool, but the pink does kinda stand out.
 
  • #14
Taturana said:
The math is correct in the Laplace transform, right?

Who cares? You're probably better off having the math wrong. That way, if you find a female who actually can point out to you that there's an error in the math, you'll have found someone sufficiently geeky to understand your sense of humor.
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
Who dares critique XKCD!?


(You can buy the T http://store.xkcd.com/" .)

Should anyone under 70 be wearing those polo shirts?

Good point, Moonbear. I mean, who wouldn't want to find someone who knows there's a mistake in the math on your t-shirt. Would life get any better?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
BobG said:
Negatives: Pierre LaPlace wasn't very romantic. William Hamilton was much more romantic. On a moonlit stroll with his wife, he carved into the stone of the Brougham Bridge: i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = -1

no way, galois was the most romantic of all... or was he creepiest? :-p
 
  • #17
I really don't like xkcd for the maths though, I don't like calculus-based maths. I like these 'my hobby' strips better from him. One of my favourite comics though, very original humour.
 
  • #18
What I think?

"bancomicsans.com"[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Why would comic sans be banned?

As the name suggests, it's a sans-serif font for comics, and I daresay it's one of the best fonts around for that. The font is excellent for speech balloons, it's lose, random, and very readable for short texts.

However, I've had electrodynamics lectures in the damned font. It might be one of the worst fonts for that, because it's hard to read.

Any thing on a screen, arial or verdana is the best. Also, that supposedly serif fonts are better readable for body texts is a myth that has never been proven. It apparently originates from one research which had one sans font, which was the hardest to read of all.

http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/literaturereview.html

As it looks, the readability of different typefaces seems to differ more between individual members of either family, than of some of both. Typefaces that are easy to read are arial (sans), helvetica (sans), times (serif), verdana (sans), computer modern (serif).

Typefaces which are hard to read are lucida console (serif), impact (sans).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
You should watch the video on the bottom of this page, it will explain all: http://bancomicsans.com/main/?page_id=2" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
Hopefully,

d/dt (♥) > 0, and

d2/dt2 (♥) > 0.

Well with the right object.
 
  • #22
drizzle said:
<heart|heart>=?... :biggrin:

Hmm I think, in the old days, before Dirac, the vector notation would have been:

15cki1c.jpg
 
  • #23
Moonbear said:
Who cares? You're probably better off having the math wrong. That way, if you find a female who actually can point out to you that there's an error in the math, you'll have found someone sufficiently geeky to understand your sense of humor.

+1

Great idea!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
21K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K