What do you think humans would evolve into

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisalviola
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around speculative ideas regarding the future evolution of humans, considering factors such as environmental changes, societal influences, and potential mutations. Participants explore various hypotheses about physical and cognitive changes over time, touching on themes of adaptation, societal behavior, and cultural perceptions of evolution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Speculative reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that humans may lose certain senses due to pollution and radiation, potentially developing new abilities like mental telepathy.
  • Others argue that while humans might evolve slightly in terms of intelligence and physical traits, significant changes are unlikely over the next several hundred thousand years.
  • A viewpoint suggests that societal xenophobia could lead to the segregation of any "mutants" that arise from evolutionary changes.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the longevity of humanity, suggesting that we may not survive long enough to witness significant evolutionary changes.
  • There are humorous references to popular culture, such as the movie "Idiocracy," which some participants relate to their views on future evolution.
  • One participant speculates that humans could evolve into machines, reflecting on the integration of technology into human life.
  • Discussions include the idea that future humans may develop traits like better livers or adaptations to a sedentary lifestyle.
  • Some participants reference an article speculating that humans could split into two distinct species based on evolutionary pressures.
  • There is a debate about the reasons behind physical traits like smaller jaws and faces, with some participants asserting that these traits are the result of evolutionary pressures while others challenge these claims as speculative.
  • Speculation about the influence of external factors, such as the discovery of a monolith, on human evolution is also mentioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the specifics of future human evolution. Multiple competing hypotheses are presented, and the discussion remains largely speculative and unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about societal behavior and evolutionary theory that are not universally accepted. The discussion includes speculative elements that may not be grounded in empirical evidence.

  • #31
Polymorph said:
However, we developed smaller faces because resources were precious, and energy not put into building a huge jaw and face could be put to use elsewhere, such as height and brains.
You are really just speculating. There is no way to know why our smaller faces were selected. The minimum requirement for a mutation to endure is simply that a new trait must not be a disadvantage.

Neanderthals had both larger brains and larger jaws than ours. They lasted something like 124 thousand years before the emergence of Cro-Magnon man, so I think we can rule out the notion that downsizing the jaw allows resources to be shunted to a larger brain.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
zoobyshoe said:
You are really just speculating. There is no way to know why our smaller faces were selected. The minimum requirement for a mutation to endure is simply that a new trait must not be a disadvantage.

Neanderthals had both larger brains and larger jaws than ours. They lasted something like 124 thousand years before the emergence of Cro-Magnon man, so I think we can rule out the notion that downsizing the jaw allows resources to be shunted to a larger brain.

You are absolutely correct, I am just speculating.

Neanderthals probably had reasons for larger jaws. Wear on the teeth found would seem to indicate that they not only ate a rougher diet, there has been speculation that they used them to hold skins while cleaning them. Bite down, scrape away.
 
  • #33
We haven't found a monolith yet, so when we do find one we will slowly evolve into higher intelligence without us knowing.
 
  • #34
lisab said:
This may have been discussed previously somewhere on PF in the past. The article quatoes an evolutionary theorist who speculates that humans will break into two species: one would be tall, good-looking, and smart; the other, "goblin-like" and dim-witted.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm

Hmmm, a little too speculative to be taken seriously, but amusing nonetheless.

It sounds much too silly for me, though; there's far too much interbreeding for such a split to be possible. Maybe it was sensible speculation back in Wells' day, but not now.
 
  • #35
lisab said:
This may have been discussed previously somewhere on PF in the past. The article quatoes an evolutionary theorist who speculates that humans will break into two species: one would be tall, good-looking, and smart; the other, "goblin-like" and dim-witted.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm

Hmmm, a little too speculative to be taken seriously, but amusing nonetheless.

I think HG Wells already did that one.

edit. Ah CRGH caught that already.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K