Understanding the Equation B = del x A in Electromagnetic Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter lalligagger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del Mean
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the equation B = ∇ x A within the context of electromagnetic theory, specifically focusing on the interpretation of the vector potential A and its relationship to magnetic fields. The original poster is tasked with identifying an error in a proof related to curl and divergence, which involves this equation and Gauss's Law for magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks a physical interpretation of the equation B = ∇ x A before attempting the problem. Some participants discuss the relationship between magnetic force and the vector potential, while others inquire about the physical significance of A and its necessity in the context of magnetic fields.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the vector potential A and its implications in electromagnetic theory. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of Stokes' theorem, but there remains a lack of consensus on the physical meaning of A.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the course covers vector calculus topics not included in earlier calculus classes, which may contribute to the confusion regarding the equation and its application. There is also mention of a desire for additional context from the original problem, which has not been fully shared.

lalligagger
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Not going to write out the whole problem (yet). It's a "find the error in the incorrect proof" type of question in a section on curl and divergence.

Homework Equations



B = \nablax A is given as an equation of "electromagnetic theory" and used in the proof. It's stated that the error is not in this equation. The other equation used in the proof is Gauss's Law for magnetic fields, but I get that one.

The Attempt at a Solution



Haven't really tried; I'd like to know the physical interpretation of the above equation before I start staring at integrals. I just got through electricity and magnetism in my general physics course, but this doesn't look familiar. I'm assuming that A is some type of force field, but what field would satisfy the equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well μH = ∇ X A

Magnetic Force
 
Thanks Pion, but can you elaborate? What is μH and how does it relate to B?
BTW, this is for a course that basically covers vector calculus that our math department doesn't in early calc classes. The question is really just about applying Stoke's theorem, which I understand pretty well. It's just the one equation that I don't get is keeping me from even starting the problem.
I can try and scan the problem if more context is needed, but it's nothing I want to write out here.
 
Ok, A is the vector potential of B. Does A have any physical meaning or is it just an arbitrary vector that must exist because \nabla\bulletB=0?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
962
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K