Maximum electric field from magnetic field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the amplitude of an oscillating electric field generated by a magnetic field in a solenoid, which oscillates at a specific frequency and amplitude. The context is rooted in electromagnetic theory, particularly Faraday's law of induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate equations relating electric and magnetic fields, particularly questioning the use of the differential and integral forms of Faraday's law. There is uncertainty about the correct application of these equations and the integration process involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different forms of the relevant equations and discussing the implications of oscillating magnetic fields. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of integrals and the interpretation of the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the specific calculations or assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the integration surface and the treatment of the oscillating magnetic field, with participants questioning how to incorporate time-dependent variables into their calculations.

Schfra
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the central region of a solenoid that is connected to a radio frequency power source, the magnetic field oscillates at 2.5·10^6 cycles per second with an amplitude of 4 gauss. What is the amplitude of the oscillating electric field at a point 3 cm from the axis? (This point lies within the region where the magnetic field is nearly uniform.)

Homework Equations



∇ × E = −∂B/∂t (maybe)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I could only find one equation relating the electric field to the magnetic field in my book. I’m not sure if it’s right or not.

∇ × E = −∂B/∂t

I’m not really sure where to go from here. I’m guessing I have the wrong equation, but I’m not quite sure since I haven’t taken calc 3 and am not very familiar with partial differentiation or gradients.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What book are you using? Usually, you start with the integral version of that law. (And it is the one you want to use.) Is that in your book?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schfra
vela said:
What book are you using? Usually, you start with the integral version of that law. (And it is the one you want to use.) Is that in your book?
Is it this one?

714288a1913936f300005be259128ef351ecb6b3


I’m not quite sure how to use this equation. It was listed first, I just didn’t include it because I didn’t see the electric field anywhere.
 
Yeah, that's the one, though it's not in the most useful form. If you integrate the differential form of the law on a surface ##S## bounded by a closed path ##C##, you get
$$\int_S (\nabla \times \vec{E})\cdot d\vec{A} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{A}.$$ The righthand side is just the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the surface ##S##. Using Stokes' theorem, you can express the lefthand side as a line integral:
$$\oint_S (\nabla \times \vec{E})\cdot d\vec{A} = \oint_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}.$$ (This is what you will learn in Calc 3, but you'll just have to accept it right now as a given.) Combining the two, you get
$$\oint_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{A}.$$ This is the form that's more useful for solving this problem. The lefthand side you should recognize as the induced emf around the path ##C##. Using the symmetry of the situation in the problem, you can evaluate the line integral for the appropriate path.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schfra
vela said:
Yeah, that's the one, though it's not in the most useful form. If you integrate the differential form of the law on a surface ##S## bounded by a closed path ##C##, you get
$$\int_S (\nabla \times \vec{E})\cdot d\vec{A} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{A}.$$ The righthand side is just the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the surface ##S##. Using Stokes' theorem, you can express the lefthand side as a line integral:
$$\oint_S (\nabla \times \vec{E})\cdot d\vec{A} = \oint_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}.$$ (This is what you will learn in Calc 3, but you'll just have to accept it right now as a given.) Combining the two, you get
$$\oint_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{A}.$$ This is the form that's more useful for solving this problem. The lefthand side you should recognize as the induced emf around the path ##C##. Using the symmetry of the situation in the problem, you can evaluate the line integral for the appropriate path.

Would the left side of that equation be equal to the electric field multiplied by the circumference of a circle that has a radius of the .03m, the distance from the axis?
E(2πr)
=.06(pi)E
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schfra
vela said:
Yes.
For the right side I assume B is .0004T. I’m not quite sure about what surface I’m integrating over or about the math there though. What surface is the integral referring to?
 
Last edited:
The surface is the disk defined by the circle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schfra
vela said:
The surface is the disk defined by the circle.
So would the integral on the right hand side be equal to
π(.03m)^2(.0004T)
= 3.6E-7π

And wouldn’t the partial derivative of that be equal to 0?
 
  • #10
The problem statement says the magnetic field oscillates with time, so you don’t want to set B to a constant.
 
  • #11
vela said:
The problem statement says the magnetic field oscillates with time, so you don’t want to set B to a constant.
How would I find that then? I’m guessing that 2.5E6hz and .0004T will both be part of it.

Would it maybe be .0004sin(2.5E6t)?
 
  • #12
Almost. Remember the argument of the sine function needs to be in radians, not cycles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Schfra
  • #13
vela said:
Almost. Remember the argument of the sine function needs to be in radians, not cycles.
So would it be .0004sin(2pi(2.5E6t))?

I believe sin(2pi) gives a frequncy of one cycle per second. Then multiplying the inside by 2.5E6 should also multiply the frequency by the same number.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K