What does Damage Equivalent Load (DEL) mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LT72884
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Software
AI Thread Summary
Damage Equivalent Load (DEL) is a concept used in structural engineering and fatigue analysis to quantify the impact of cyclic or repetitive loading on materials and structures. It helps in assessing how different loading conditions can lead to similar damage effects over time. In the context of openFAST software, DEL is calculated based on specific parameters, such as frequency and time duration, to evaluate the forces experienced by components like wind turbine blades. Understanding DEL is crucial for predicting structural integrity and lifespan under varying operational conditions. This metric ultimately aids in designing more resilient structures by accounting for fatigue effects.
LT72884
Messages
335
Reaction score
49
Hello all, I am using an open source software called openFAST, and it shows various outputs such as the force along the x axis as the blade rotates around.

I then use a python script that uses the following equation:
del.PNG

where:
neq.PNG


and feq = 2.1Hrz for my example and T is 60 seconds

This is what is called Damage Equivalent Load, but im not sure what that actually means? Equivalent to what? What exactly is DEL? is it based off of cycles or something?
thanks
 

Attachments

  • del.PNG
    del.PNG
    2.7 KB · Views: 129
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top