What does it mean for a partial derivative to be continuous at a point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of continuity of partial derivatives in relation to differentiability of a function at a point. It explains that if one partial derivative exists and is continuous at a point while the other is defined, the function is differentiable at that point. The user seeks clarification on a specific part of the textbook's proof involving the mean value theorem and how it relates to the continuity of the partial derivative. It is emphasized that as both variables approach zero, the difference between the partial derivative at nearby points and at the point of interest approaches zero, confirming continuity. Understanding this continuity is crucial for grasping the overall differentiability of the function.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
I'm trying to the follow the work shown in the textbook, but getting a little confused.

Theorem I. Suppose the function f(x,y) is defined in some neighborhood of the of the point (a,b). Suppose one of the partial derivatives, say, ∂f/∂x, exists at each point of the neighborhood and is continuous at (a,b), while the other partial derivative is defined at least at the point (a,b). Then f is differentiable at (a,b).

The first thing the book does is write down

f(a+h, b+k) - f(a,b) = f(a+h, b+k) - f(a, b+k) + f(a, b+k) - f(a,b).

Okay. So far, so good.

Now, the part I put in red looks like the [f(a,b+k)-f(a,b)]/k, the partial derivative of f with respect to y at (a,b) when k approaches zero. But since k is just k, we can write this as

f(a+h, b+k) - f(a, b+k) = k ∂f/∂y|(a,b) + Ω1k, where Ω1 approaches zero as k approaches 0.

The part I put in blue, I suppose, could similarly be rewritten as h ∂f/∂x|(a,b+k) + hΩ2. Instead the book uses the mean value theorem as such:

f(a+h, b+k) - f(a, b+k) = h ∂f/∂x|(a+øh, b+k), where 0<ø<1.

Because ∂f/∂x is assumed to be continuous at (a,b), we can write

∂f/∂x|(a+øh, b+k) = ∂f/∂x|(a,b) + Ω2, where Ω2 --> 0 as k --> 0 and h --> 0.

The part in green is what I do not understand. Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's just what it means for the partial derivative to be continuous at (a,b). Since ∂f/∂x|(a+øh, b+k) -> ∂f/∂x|(a,b) as h -> 0 and k -> 0, we can for example define Ω2 to be the difference ∂f/∂x|(a+øh, b+k) - ∂f/∂x|(a,b) and see that Ω2 -> 0 when h -> 0 and k -> 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K