MHB What does the following means?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Means
AI Thread Summary
The statement suggests that in Euclidean geometry, two distinct straight lines cannot share two points without being the same line. If two lines have two points in common, they must coincide entirely. This reinforces the idea that lines can either be parallel with no points in common or intersect at exactly one point. The discussion clarifies the relationship between lines and points in geometric terms. Overall, the concept emphasizes the uniqueness of straight lines in relation to their points.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everybody,
What does the following means:
Two straight lines cannot have any two points of one coincide with two points of the other without the lines coinciding altogether?

I think it means that line can't overlap with itself.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I take that statement to mean that no two straight lines can have two points in common without being the same line (coinciding).
 
In other words, in Euclidean geometry, two distinct lines are either parallel, and have no points in common, or intersect, and have exactly one point in common.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
18K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
72
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
397
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top