What does the wavenumber in a group velocity represent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of group velocity for wave packets constructed from multiple plane waves, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics and phonon dispersion relations. The group velocity is defined as \(v_g = \frac{d\omega}{dk}\), where \(\omega\) is the angular frequency and \(k\) is the wavenumber. The confusion arises when determining which specific value of \(k\) to use for a wave packet, especially when considering the dispersion relation \(\omega(k) = \sqrt{\frac{4K}{m}}\left|\sin\left(\frac{ka}{2}\right)\right|\) for phonons in a crystal. The discussion emphasizes that the group velocity can be zero at the boundaries of the first Brillouin zone, leading to questions about the definition of a wave packet and the average wavenumber.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave-particle duality
  • Familiarity with dispersion relations and their mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of phonon behavior in solid-state physics
  • Basic concepts of wave packets and their construction from multiple waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the dispersion relation for phonons in a 1D monoatomic chain
  • Learn about the implications of group velocity in different physical contexts
  • Research methods for calculating the average wavenumber in wave packets
  • Explore the Bose-Einstein distribution function and its application in solid-state physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of wave packets and phonon dynamics.

confused_man
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to wrap my head around the dispersion relation ##\omega(k)##. I understand how you can construct a wavepacket by combining multiple traveling waves of different wavelengths. I can then calculate the phase and group velocities of this wavepacket:
\begin{align*}
v_p &= \frac{\omega}{k} \\
v_g &= \frac{d\omega}{dk} .
\end{align*}

Suppose that I'm looking at a free quantum mechanical particle, the dispersion relation is
\begin{align*}
E &= \hbar\omega =\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\\
\omega &= \frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}
\end{align*}
Since ##\omega## depends the wavenumber in a non-linear way, I understand that a wavepacket made of a combination of these plane waves will experience dispersion and will spread out.

If I'm talking about a pure plane wave with frequency ##k##, then I wouldn't use the group velocity to describe how fast it's moving, I'd just use the phase velocity.

My question is if I'm looking at a wave packet built up from a number of different plane waves and I want to calculate its group velocity, what value of ##k## should I use? The group velocity equation only has a single ##k## in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I initially started getting confused about this when thinking about phonons. A single phonon is an excitation of a single mode with frequency ##\omega##. In a crystal, there are a vast number of phonons corresponding to the excitations of multiple modes of different frequencies. The number of phonons in each mode follows the Bose Einstein distribution function.

These "modes" can be different types of functions, depending on what's most convenient to describe the situation. If we are dealing with a crystal that is in thermal equilibrium, the simplest set of functions that I can use as the individual modes are the various standing waves that I can fit into the crystal of length ##L## (the longest mode having a wavelenth ##\lambda = 2L## and the shortest with ##\lambda = 2a##, where ##a## is the distance between atoms in the lattice). If we are dealing with a situation where one end of the crystal is being excited, say by heating it, it makes more sense to use a set of traveling waves as a basis to describe the crystal vibration.

If you read a solid state textbook, at this point it's usually the case that the book discusses the dispersion relation of phonons around this point. The easiest thing to do is to start with a 1D monoatomic chain of atoms of mass ##m## connected by springs with a spring constant ##K##. You then get the following dispersion relation: $$\omega(k) = \sqrt{\frac{4K}{m}}\left|\sin\left(\frac{ka}{2}\right)\right|. $$
This is where I start to go bonkers. Like I said above, I think of a phonon as an excitation of a single vibration mode of frequency ##\omega## and energy ##\hbar \omega##, and corresponding to this, a single value of ##k##. The textbooks I have then process to discuss the group velocity of the phonons based on the dispersion relation and talk about how at the boundary of the first Brillouin zone (i.e., when ##k = \pm \pi/a##) the phonons have a group velocity of 0 since ##d\omega/dk=0## at the boundary. BUT HOW CAN PHONONS HAVE A GROUP VELOCITY?? Don't they by definition, represent the vibration of a single pure mode with a single frequency ##\omega## and ##k##?

OR, when they say that the group velocity is zero at ##k=\pm \pi/a##, are they referring to a wavepacket made of a bunch of traveling waves with various wavenumbers. If so, then it comes back to my initial question, how can this wavepacket get defined by a single wavenumber? What wavenumber do I put in there? Is it the average? Does this dispersion relation mean that I can construct a wavepacket with any number of traveling waves with various ##k## values, but if the average ##k## is equal to ##\pm \pi/a## then it doesn't move? How do you even calculate the average ##k##? Would you need to use the Bose Einstein distribution function or is it just the simple arithmetic mean?

Please help. The more I think about this the more I am getting messed up!
 
confused_man said:
My question is if I'm looking at a wave packet built up from a number of different plane waves and I want to calculate its group velocity, what value of kk should I use? The group velocity equation only has a single kk in it.
As you have already said you need more than one wave to have a wave packet. So you have a certan bandwidth of ##\Delta k## around a center wave number ## k ## and you have to put this in the dispersion equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K