What does this mean ##U=\int F\times d\vec{r}## in the Work-Energy Theorem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the equation ##U=\int \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}## in the context of the Work-Energy Theorem. The user initially confuses the cross product with the dot product, which is clarified by another participant. The correct formulation emphasizes that both force and displacement are vector quantities, and the work done is represented as the integral of the dot product of these vectors. This distinction is crucial for accurately applying the theorem in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with the Work-Energy Theorem
  • Knowledge of dot and cross products in vector mathematics
  • Basic principles of physics related to work and energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector calculus applications in physics
  • Learn about the Work-Energy Theorem in detail
  • Explore the differences between dot and cross products
  • Investigate practical examples of work done by forces in various paths
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of vector mathematics in the context of energy and work.

n3pix
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm newly discovering the world of the Energy.

My question is about the equation ##U=\int \vec{F}\times d\vec{r}=-\int \vec{F}_{s}\times d\vec{r}##.

Can you tell me what does this equation means?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you are familiar with the expression work=force * distance. U=F*r (letting r stand for distance)

But now consider a more complicated path, not a straight line distance.

We can divide the curved line into a number of nearly straight segments dx. The work for each segment dU=Fdr.

Then ##U=\sum{F dr}=\int F dr##

More generally both F and dr can be vectors, not just scalars as in your OP.
 
In your equation F and dr are vectors. When multiplying vectors an “x” means something very specific and not just “times”. I am sure you meant to use a dot for the dot product and not a “x” for the cross product which makes no sense here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Delta2, n3pix and 1 other person
Note, by the way, that it's ##\vec F.d\vec r##, not ##\vec F\times d\vec r## - it's the inner product of the force vector and the displacement vector, not the cross product.

Edit - beaten to it by mere seconds, I see...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Cutter Ketch

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K