So I have been thinking a little more about the problem I had and I'd like to share it for future reference.
The missing mass squared we define using the 4-momenta P as (Pπ-PK)2 where we investigate it under a so called π+ hypothesis, meaning we assume the mass of the particle we detected is that of m(π+)~0.139 GeV/c2.
1. Data is collected from a measurement system which can output the momentum of the particle.
2. We construct the 4-momenta of the initial K+, with an assumed constant absolute momentum of 75 GeV/c and mass of ~0.494 GeV/c2 (this can be refined if you can properly match the decay registered in the detector we use to measure the pion with its mother particle upstream).
3. Likewise we construct the 4-momenta of the particle decays registered in our detector.
4. We calculate (Pπ-PK)2.
5. We construct a histogram with the data.
Few points on the analysis:
-All of the K+ decays are bounded by (m(π+)-m(K+)2=0.122 (GeV/c2)2, which is the response when all decayed particles are measured in our detector.
-The π0 particle rapidly decays, usually into two photons, which commonly escape the detector system, thus the peak at m(π0)2.
-The negative valued peak arise from the μ+ having less mass (~106 GeV/c2) than π+, which under the π+ hypothesis results in the negative value. I assume the maximum value should be located at -(m(μ+))2 ~ -0.0112 (GeV/c2)2, but I am not sure. It could also be at -(m(π0)-m(μ+))2 ~ -0.0011 (GeV/c2)2
-The lower boundaries on K+→π+π0π0 and K+→π+π+π- equal the actual missing mass from only detecting one particle, so (m(2⋅π0))2 and (m(2⋅π+/-))2 respectively. m(π0)~0.135 GeV/c2.
-For the decay K+→π+[itex]\nu \bar{\nu}[/itex] I am also not completely sure, my best guess is that it is bounded in the lower limit by no signal detection or low momentum, and in the upper limit by the full kaon momentum being transferred to the particle and that the neutrinos went off 180 degrees perpendicular to each other. Reasoning like this makes me think that the lower limit would be the latter suggestion, but that wouldn't conform with the earlier hypothesis I had, which is why I will need to investigate this further.
Any clarification on the subject is appreciated.
cheers
rjseen