What exactly is Einstein's famous E = MC^2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shadae758
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Einstein's equation E = mc², which illustrates the equivalence of mass and energy. This relationship was established in Einstein's 1905 paper titled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" The constant 'c' represents the speed of light, which is derived from Maxwell's equations and interpreted as the maximum speed of causality. The equation can be understood without direct reference to light, as it is fundamentally about the conservation of energy across different frames of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's 1905 paper "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?"
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and their implications.
  • Basic knowledge of Lorentz transformations in special relativity.
  • Concept of four-vectors in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Einstein's original paper on mass-energy equivalence.
  • Study Maxwell's equations to understand their role in physics.
  • Explore Lorentz transformations and their derivation.
  • Investigate the concept of four-vectors and their applications in relativity.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of relativity and the relationship between mass and energy.

shadae758
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
With the famous news of the LHC, I had did a little research about how it works. Apparently, it works via energy mass equivalence.

After dancing around the net, I had a brief idea of how E = MC^2 came about. But still, it isn't very clear.

Exactly how does the speed of light come into play?

I know C meant constant, and speed of light just happens to be that constant, but how did we arrive on that constant? What makes it so sure that this C^2 is the relationship?

Would appreciate a layman answer, preferably with less maths.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FAQ: Where does E=mc2 come from?

Einstein found this result in a 1905 paper, titled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" This paper is very short and readable, and is available online. A summary of the argument is as follows. Define a frame of reference A, and let an object O, initially at rest in this frame, emit two flashes of light in opposite directions. Now define another frame of reference B, in motion relative to A along the same axis as the one along which the light was emitted. Then in order to preserve conservation of energy in both frames, we are forced to attribute a different inertial mass to O before and after it emits the light. The interpretation is that mass and energy are equivalent. By giving up a quantity of energy E, the object has reduced its mass by an amount E/c2, where c is the speed of light.

Why does c occur in the equation? Although Einstein's original derivation happens to involve the speed of light, E=mc2 can be derived without talking about light at all. One can derive the Lorentz transformations using a set of postulates that don't say anything about light (see, e.g., Rindler 1979). The constant c is then interpreted simply as the maximum speed of causality, not necessarily the speed of light. We construct the momentum four-vector of a particle in the obvious way, by multiplying its mass by its four-velocity. (This construction is unique in the sense that there is no other rank-1 tensor with units of momentum that can be formed from m and v. The only way to form any other candidate is to bring in other quantities, such a constant with units of mass, or the acceleration vector. Such possibilities have physically unacceptable properties, such as violating additivity or causality.) We find that this four-vector's norm equals E2-p2c2, and can be interpreted as m2c4, where m is the particle's rest mass. In the case where the particle is at rest, p=0, and we recover E=mc2.

A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik. 18 (1905) 639, available online at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Rindler, Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, 1979, p. 51
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
17K