What factors make landing on Mars easier than on the Earth? Harder?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nukeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Factors Mars
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of landing on Mars compared to Earth, highlighting that Mars lacks competing air traffic and associated flight control rules, making it easier in that regard. However, the thin Martian atmosphere presents significant challenges, as it requires innovative landing techniques due to insufficient aerodynamic drag and the impracticality of traditional rocket deceleration methods. The Curiosity rover exemplifies advancements in landing technology, utilizing a combination of aerodynamic drag, parachutes, and rockets for a successful landing. The entry, descent, and landing phase remains the most perilous aspect of Mars missions, with a historic failure rate of 66 percent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mars atmospheric conditions and pressure differences
  • Familiarity with spacecraft landing techniques, including aerodynamic drag and rocket propulsion
  • Knowledge of the engineering challenges in space missions, particularly entry, descent, and landing (EDL)
  • Experience with simulation tools like Orbiter for practical application
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the engineering principles behind the Curiosity rover's landing system
  • Explore the physics of atmospheric entry and its effects on spacecraft design
  • Study the historical failure rates of Mars landings and the lessons learned
  • Experiment with landing simulations using Orbiter to understand the dynamics of Martian landings
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space mission planners, students of planetary science, and enthusiasts interested in the complexities of Mars exploration and landing technologies.

nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Iv been watching the NASA guys work on the Mars lander on Ustream, and starting to really get into it. But I have a question:

What factors make landing on Mars easier than on the Earth? Harder?

And I am having a debate with a friend, maybe one of you can help. Which variables are important for a successful landing, eg. mass, size, shape.?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
easier:
no competing air traffic and its associated flight control rules

harder:
no flight control rules, and no other traffic that can contribute to weather reports , etc.
also: thin atmosphere makes things happen faster ...

but colder atmosphere makes for easier maneuverability of a landing craft ... easier than were that atmosphere at a temp usually found on earth. Low temperatures increase density, and airfoils and associated control surfaces depend on density to be effective: more dense = more responsive control of the vehicle. Its usually easier to fly in the winter time here ...
 
As for the lander it self, Which variables are important for a successful landing, eg. mass, size, shape.?
 
Risks and probability of catastrophic landing depends on many things.

Think of how you would build a MArs LAnder that would ensure its total destruction as it slammed into the Martian surface

Trick is to avoid these things
 
The air is thick enough that using a rocket to decelerate (like the NASA moon lander) is impractical because a rocket plume is unstable at the airspeeds involved.

However, the air is also too thin to rely on aerodynamic drag effects to slow down a heavy spacecraft (as in the space shuttle, Apollo CM, etc).

What's a method that works in the middle? We don't know, and we have no experience in that regime. We've gotten away with it so far because our Mars landers have been very light.

edit for more:

The new rover (Curiosity) is too large to use airbags like the previous rovers have, so it's been designed to use a fairly interesting arrangement of aerodynamic drag from an aeroshell and later parachutes, and rockets at the final stage. Look it up for more info.

Also, I recommend you download Orbiter:

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/home.php

and try landing on Mars yourself...
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't gradual decceleration before achieving Mars orbit decrease risk?


Excerpt:
Entry, Descent and Landing on Mars

With an historic failure rate of 66 per cent, the entry, descent and landing phase of the Mars mission is the most dangerous six minutes of the nearly two-year journey. Because the Mars surface pressure is less than one per cent of Earth’s—not enough to slow a spacecraft down—the engineering challenge is to find a way to slow the Mars lander from its entry velocity that might be in excel of of 19,000 kilometres an hour to zero impact in just six minutes. Steadily improving deceleration and landing techniques for every mission, engineers have been developing new technologies to help reduce the risks.
http://www.racetomars.ca/mars/article_descent.jsp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I must be oversimplifying this in my head, because it seems to me that a shallower approach angle would suffice.
 
LURCH said:
I must be oversimplifying this in my head, because it seems to me that a shallower approach angle would suffice.

Maybe that would increase atmospheric friction heating time beyond present shield endurance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
6K