What happen time dilation is videotaped?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of time dilation as experienced by two observers, one stationary on Earth and the other moving at relativistic speeds. Participants explore the implications of time dilation on video transmissions between these observers, considering scenarios involving both direct motion away from Earth and orbital motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that time dilation causes Person B's time to appear slower to Person A, leading to questions about how this affects a live video stream.
  • One participant suggests that if Person A watches a live video stream of Person B, he would see events happening in slow motion due to time dilation.
  • Another participant raises the question of how fast an object must travel for time dilation effects to be noticeable in video transmissions.
  • There is a discussion about the impact of signal transmission time on the perceived time of events, especially as Person B moves away from Earth.
  • Some participants explore scenarios where Person B is in orbit, questioning whether the same principles apply as with linear motion away from Earth.
  • A hypothetical scenario is presented involving a rocket in circular motion, where both observers perceive the other's video at different rates due to relativistic effects.
  • One participant explains that if Person B transmits a live video stream while traveling at 80% of the speed of light, Person A would see B's watch running at a third the rate of his own watch, factoring in time dilation and transmission delays.
  • Another participant clarifies that for a satellite traveling at 250,000 mph, the time dilation effect would be minimal, with only slight delays in video transmission due to increasing distance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the effects of time dilation and signal transmission on video streams, with no consensus reached on the specifics of how these effects manifest in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of motion (linear vs. orbital) and the complexities introduced by acceleration and gravitational effects, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in relativity, time dilation, and the implications of high-speed motion on communication and perception of time.

Ruari1967
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am sure this question is a lot more elementary than a lot of other posts on here - I am definitely a layman rather than a specialist, so I hope this isn't a problem. My hypothetical question is this:

Person A is standing directly on earth, looking at his watch (so moving at the same speed relative to each other); Person B is moving close to the speed of light away from earth, again, looking at his watch. My layman's knowledge would tell me that time for Person B would slow down and take longer than Person A due to time dilation. However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see? If 5 minutes for Person A takes 15 minutes for person B, there is a 10-minute gap, which I can't explain.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

There are no gaps. Time is perceived to run slower, making everything appear to happen in slow motion.

...unless the video tape is recorded by a local observer and then mailed, then the video tape looks normal but short.
 
Thanks for the reply! How fast would an object have to be going to make this noticeable? Would a 2-hour video on a satellite traveling at 250,000mph would be a few seconds slower for the observer on earth?
 
Ruari1967 said:
However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see?
Not sure what you have in mind for a 'live' feed, since it takes time for the signal to reach person A. And as time goes on B gets further away, so the signal takes longer to reach A.
 
I suppose Person B doesn't actually have to be traveling away from the Earth - if they were in orbit, the same principal would still apply, wouldn't it?
 
The simplest scenario getting at what I think is your question is to imagine an un-accelerating space lab far from any massive body, and a rocket accelerating in a circular path (constant speed but constant acceleration to maintain circular path) around the space lab at high speed. Let's say each broadcasts video of people dancing to the same recording of the same music. Then, the lab will see the rocket video as in slow motion, and the rocket will see the lab video as in rapid motion.

This assumes the rocket people are able to 'ignore' extreme acceleration. Alternatively, the rocket could be moving at high speed on the circle, but at extremely large radius. Then the acceleration could be made small - e.g. 1 g. The larger radius would have no effect on the observed video once each was receiving the others video.

If you pose this on earth, you would have to take into account gravity as well, but this would be a much smaller effect as long as the rocket is going very fast (if the you were talking about a satellite orbiting, the orbital motion and gravitational effect would be of similar order of magnitude; that's why GPS systems have to account for both).
 
Ruari1967 said:
I am sure this question is a lot more elementary than a lot of other posts on here - I am definitely a layman rather than a specialist, so I hope this isn't a problem. My hypothetical question is this:

Person A is standing directly on earth, looking at his watch (so moving at the same speed relative to each other); Person B is moving close to the speed of light away from earth, again, looking at his watch. My layman's knowledge would tell me that time for Person B would slow down and take longer than Person A due to time dilation. However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see? If 5 minutes for Person A takes 15 minutes for person B, there is a 10-minute gap, which I can't explain.

Thanks in advance.
If Person B is traveling at 80% of the speed of light away from the Earth and transmits a live video stream of his watch back to earth, Person A would see B's watch running at 1/3 the rate of his own watch. That means that after 15 minutes according to A's watch, he will see B's watch advance by only 5 minutes.

Now according to Special Relativity, in the frame of the earth, Person B's watch is time dilated so that it runs slow at 60% of normal and will have advanced by 9 minutes after 15 minutes goes by on Earth but since it takes time for the "live video stream" to get from B to A traveling at the speed of light an additional 4 minutes is tied up in the transmission. This combined effect of time dilation and increasing transmission time is called Relativistic Doppler in case you want to investigate it further.
 
Ruari1967 said:
Thanks for the reply! How fast would an object have to be going to make this noticeable? Would a 2-hour video on a satellite traveling at 250,000mph would be a few seconds slower for the observer on earth?
Yes, at that speed if a "satellite" were traveling directly away from earth, a 2 hour video transmitted back to Earth would take 2.7 seconds longer but this is essentially all caused by the increasing transmission time since the time dilation at this speed is miniscule. 250,000 mph is only 0.037% of light speed.
Ruari1967 said:
I suppose Person B doesn't actually have to be traveling away from the Earth - if they were in orbit, the same principal would still apply, wouldn't it?
No, if Person B or the satellite is in orbit, then the transmission time is not always increasing and so it's just the time dilation that is a factor. The satellite would have to be going much faster than 250,000 mph in order for more than a 1 second slow down in a 2 hour video. At 1% light speed (6,706,152 mph), there is about a third of a second increase. At 2% light speed (13,412,304 mph), the increase is a little less than one and a half seconds.

If Person B were traveling around the Earth at 80% light speed, the time dilation would result in Person A seeing 9 minutes go by on B's watch while 15 minutes goes by on A's watch. Person B would have to be orbiting at 95.3% light speed in order for Person A to see only 5 minutes go by on B's watch while 15 minutes goes by on A's watch.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
959
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K