What Happens to a Cube When 99% of Its Mass Disappears?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter martix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment concerning a cube that suddenly loses 99% of its mass while resting on a rigid, level surface. Participants explore the implications of this scenario on the forces acting on the cube and the resulting motion, delving into concepts of equilibrium and material behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if 99% of the cube's mass disappears, the cube would be shot upwards due to the sudden loss of downward force, questioning how high it would go and what the upward force would be.
  • Another participant challenges the initial premise by questioning why the upward force would not also disappear simultaneously with the mass, proposing a scenario where splitting the cube could lead to a slight upward movement due to pressure changes, particularly in deformable materials.
  • A third participant expresses uncertainty about the mechanics involved and seeks clarification on whether a non-deformable object would experience any movement if a portion of its mass were removed.
  • One participant asserts that the upward force is directly related to the downward gravitational force, indicating that if the mass disappears, both forces would vanish, leaving the remaining portion of the cube effectively stationary on the surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of mass disappearance on the cube's motion, with no consensus reached on the outcome. Some propose that the cube would move upwards, while others argue that it would not, depending on the nature of the materials involved and the mechanics at play.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the rigidity and deformability of materials, as well as the nature of forces acting on the cube, which remain unresolved. The implications of the thought experiment are contingent on these factors.

martix
Messages
167
Reaction score
5
First of all I apologize if silly speculative discussions like this don't belong here. With that disclaimer out of the way, here's a fun thought experiment:

Let's say an object, a cube that weighs 1kg rests on a rigid, level surface. And all of a sudden 99% of its mass disappears.
What happens?
Well, my thinking is, the cube is in equilibrium, so an equal amount of up and down force acts on it. Then 99% of the down force disappears in an instant and the cube is shot up, as if it had just bounced off.
Is that anywhere near reasonable?
What would the upwards force be? 0.99*9.8 Newtons? How far up would it go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What do the laws of physics predict if we violate the laws?"
Why would the force upwards not disappear in the same moment?

To find some physical situation: if you split the block horizontally in two parts and rapidly remove the upper part, the lower block expands a bit (because pressure from above reduces), which can in theory let it jump up a bit like a spring. Won't lead to an actual jump with most materials, but with rubber and similar things it should be possible. The achievable height depends on material parameters and the way the block is split.
 
:) That's why I said silly.
Oh... that does indeed seem similar mechanically.
Sadly my physical intuition fails me here, that's why I was asking.

Am I correct in interpreting your point as, if the object(and ground) are non-deformable(i.e. not springy), nothing would happen to the lower piece?
 
The only reason a surface pushes up on an object resting on it is that the object, through gravitation force, presses down on the object. If part or all of the mass disappears, the downward force and, therefore the upward force, also disappears. It would be exactly the same as if the smaller portion that is left, alone, were sitting on the surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K