What happens to an atom's angular momentum when it absorbs an electron?

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I was thinking a little about how the absorption of angular momentum occurs from the point of view of QM. For example, suppose we have an atom A and an electron $e^-$.

The electron $e^-$ is ejected from a source radially in direction of the center of the atom. Suppose that the atom has net angular momentum $ = 0 $ and it absorbs the electron, my question is what will happen now.

I mean, the electron has angular momentum $\hbar /2$, but since it was emitted from a source in a randomly way, **it is equally probable that the spin of the electron (if we measure it while it is on the path to the atom) be collapsed in any direction.**

So, my interpretation is that the atom, after absorbing the electron, will maintain its angular momentum = 0, since in an average way the electron has angular momentum = 0.

Now, suppose we create a source that emits electron in such way that the direction of the spin is the z axis. The electron now is in the state ##|\psi \rangle = |+ \rangle/\sqrt{2} + |- \rangle/\sqrt{2}##

Supposing that the atom is enclosed by a box with an open hole in its surface that allows the electron to pass, *but that does not allow us to see inside it. Is it right to say that the atom now is in the state ##|\psi \rangle = |+ \rangle/\sqrt{2} + |- \rangle/\sqrt{2}##? In other words, it is equally probably the atom angular momentum $\hbar/2$ in the + or - direction?*

I would like to know if my statement in bold is right, and if it is right to interpret the italic way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a sodium ion (Na+) that has zero spin and orbital angular momentum, ##S=0## and ##L=0##. Its total angular momentum is ##J=L+S=0.## Say it captures an electron. The atom now has ##S=\frac{1}{2}## and ##L=0.## Its total angular momentum is not zero, it is ##J=L+S=\frac{1}{2}.## If you have a collection of such atoms and you pass them through a Stern-Gerlach machine, ideally half of them will come out "spin up" relative to the machine and the rest "spin down".
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top