- #1

brupenney

- 15

- 0

When a mass is accelerated, what happens to its length and volume? I know that when the acceleration ends, its length is governed by the equation l = l0 x sqrt (1 - v^2/C^2), but what about during the acceleration?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter brupenney
- Start date

- #1

brupenney

- 15

- 0

When a mass is accelerated, what happens to its length and volume? I know that when the acceleration ends, its length is governed by the equation l = l0 x sqrt (1 - v^2/C^2), but what about during the acceleration?

- #2

- 6,723

- 426

- #3

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 43,021

- 970

- #4

brupenney

- 15

- 0

- #5

- 6,723

- 426

The radius perpendicular to the direction of motion is unchanged.

- #6

PAllen

Science Advisor

- 8,957

- 2,173

Yes, such appearance as a disk has been dubbed a 'pancake', and, I believe Richard Feynman was the first to describe that the collision data for energetic electrons and nucleons could be explained on the assumption that the nucleon appeared as a pancake to the electron. This modelling assumption was part of his famous parton research which explained key behavior of the quark model of nucleons. Without modelling the nucleon as a pancake, the collision data could not be explained.

Last edited:

- #7

brupenney

- 15

- 0

The radius perpendicular to the direction of motion is unchanged.

Thanks Ben. How then does the mass increase without the perpendicular radius increasing? I am assuming the neutron is the most dense unit of mass possible.

- #8

brupenney

- 15

- 0

Yes, such appearance as a disk has been dubbed a 'pancake', and, I believe Richard Feynman was the first to describe that the collision data for energetic electrons and nucleons could be explained on the assumption that the nucleon appeared as a pancake to the electron. This modelling assumption was part of his famous parton research which explained key behavior of the quark model of nucleons. Without modelling the nucleon as a pancake, the collision data could not be explained.

That is extremely interesting to me, but I am not surprised by it. My own thoughts have led me to this conclusion (that of pancaking mass) which would max out at C

- #9

- 6,723

- 426

Most physicists these days don't use the relativistic mass convention that you're using, but anyway, the density of mass-energy is higher as seen in the frame where the neutron is moving.Thanks Ben. How then does the mass increase without the perpendicular radius increasing?

No, that's not true.I am assuming the neutron is the most dense unit of mass possible.

- #10

brupenney

- 15

- 0

- #11

PAllen

Science Advisor

- 8,957

- 2,173

"from an observer's point of view" does not mean "not real". Everything is measured from some observer's point of view. There isn't a "chosen" observer who's measurements are called "reality".

A quark is more dense than a neutron. There is no limit to the density observed for a moving body, as it approaches ever close to c relative to the observer. However, this does

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/black_fast.html

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 395

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 753

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 354

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 298

- Replies
- 27

- Views
- 203

- Last Post

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 458

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 263

- Replies
- 24

- Views
- 227

- Replies
- 40

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 857