What Happens When We Modify the Riemann Integral Formula?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karlisbad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the modification of the Riemann Integral formula, specifically comparing the traditional definition, \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}f(X_i )(X_{i+1}-X_{i}), with an alternative definition that incorporates the mean value of two consecutive points: \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}f(X_i )(X_{i+1}+X_{i})0.5. Participants concluded that the second definition does not align with the established Riemann Integral, as it effectively calculates f/2 rather than the intended area under the curve. The discussion also briefly touches on the existence of Bernoulli Polynomials in multiple dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann Integral concepts
  • Familiarity with summation notation
  • Basic knowledge of polynomial functions
  • Concept of mean value in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Riemann Integrals and their applications
  • Explore the implications of modifying integral definitions
  • Study Bernoulli Polynomials and their dimensionality
  • Investigate alternative integral definitions, such as the Lebesgue Integral
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced integral calculus and polynomial theory.

Karlisbad
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
If we define the Riemann Integral so:

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}f(X_i )(X_{i+1}-X_{i}[/tex]

as a "play" what would happen if i define the integral so:

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}f(X_i )(X_{i+1}+X_{i})0.5[/tex] (2)

In the second definition we define the "mean value" of 2 consecutive points instead of the difference, the question is if 2 is related to the Riemann integral by some formula.

P.D:= Do Bernoulli Polynomials exist in more than 1 dimension?..:confused: :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Karlisbad said:
If we define the Riemann Integral so:

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}f(X_i )(X_{i+1}-X_{i}[/tex]

No, we do not define the Riemann integral as that.

If you were to put down what the Riemann integral really is, you'd see that you're idea above would calculate f/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K