What I consider to be a very hard spring-potential energy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patdon10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hard
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a complex spring-potential energy problem involving a horizontal slingshot with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of 57 N/m, and a 1-kg stone. The total mechanical energy was calculated using the formula for potential elastic energy, resulting in 11.96 J after correcting for the change in spring length. The speed of the stone at x = 0 was determined to be 4.89 m/s using the conservation of energy principle. Key insights include the importance of considering the diagonal stretch of the springs and the relevance of change in gravitational potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Familiarity with potential elastic energy calculations
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Ability to apply geometry in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Hooke's Law in various contexts
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of mass on potential energy in spring systems
  • Investigate the relationship between spring compression and potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to spring systems and potential energy calculations.

Patdon10
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal slingshot consists of two light, identical springs (with spring constants of 57 N/m) and a light cup that holds a 1-kg stone. Each spring has an equilibrium length l0 = 47 cm. When the springs are in equilibrium, they line up vertically. Suppose that the cup containing the mass is pulled to x = 0.8 m to the left of the vertical and then released.

(a) Determine the system's total mechanical energy.
(b) Determine the speed of the stone at x = 0.


Homework Equations


Potential Elastic Energy: PE = (1/2)kx2
Conservation of energy: 1/2mv2 + (1/2)kx2 = 1/2mv2 + (1/2)kx2


The Attempt at a Solution


This is really tough for me. I'm really not sure how to approach this.

Starting with problem a...
There are two springs and the system is not in motion initially. We know that total mechanic energy is change in K + change in PE.

The equation would be E = (0) + kx2 = (57)(.8) = 45.6 J note I didn't make it (1/2)kx^2 because there are 2 springs.

This is not the correct answer. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 6-p-047-alt.gif
    6-p-047-alt.gif
    6 KB · Views: 765
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to square x, but x is not 0.8. The springs stretch more than that, use some geometry to calculate the change in length of the springs.
 
Oh, wow. You are totally right. I didn't think that the change in x would be in the diagonal direction.

so it would be:
sqroot(0.472 + 0.82) = 0.9278 m

(57)(0.9278)2 = 49.066 J

However, that is still the wrong answer : /
What am I missing?

Edit: You told me to find the change in x, and that's not what I was doing. Instead it should be
0.9278 - 0.47 = 0.4578 m

0.45782*57 = 11.96 J. That is the correct answer for a. : )

Now to part B:
there is no initial kinetic energy, but there is definitely final kinetic energy. Also, at the end of the equation. There is no final PE, so it would be 0. I feel like I should use the conservation of energy here. What I have is:

0 + 0.45782*57 = (1/2)mv2 + 0
solving for this, I get v = 4.89 m/s. This is the right answer again. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Hi, I am working on a very similar problem. I was wondering why the stone in the cup is not considered in the total mechanical energy of the system, when it seems to have potential energy?
 
You make a good observation, but it is not the gravitational PE that it is important, since it is referenced to an arbitrary axis, but rather, the change in gravitational PE that matters, as the the stone moves from its initial position to its 'final' position at x = 0, assuming that the slingshot is in a vertical plane. In this problem, this change is small, which would not be the case for example, if the stone had a very large mass much greater than 1 kg. Good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K