What I consider to be a very hard spring-potential energy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patdon10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hard
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a horizontal slingshot system consisting of two identical springs and a mass. The task is to analyze the total mechanical energy of the system and the speed of the mass at a specific position after being released from a stretched position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of total mechanical energy, questioning the correct application of the potential energy formula and the geometry involved in determining the change in spring length.
  • Some participants suggest using conservation of energy principles to relate potential and kinetic energy in the system.
  • One participant raises a question about the role of gravitational potential energy in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen participants attempting to clarify their understanding of the energy calculations and the geometry of the system. There is acknowledgment of errors in initial calculations, and some participants have provided guidance on correcting these approaches. Multiple interpretations regarding the significance of gravitational potential energy are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of energy conservation in a system with both elastic and gravitational potential energy, while also addressing the implications of the mass's position relative to the reference point for gravitational potential energy.

Patdon10
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal slingshot consists of two light, identical springs (with spring constants of 57 N/m) and a light cup that holds a 1-kg stone. Each spring has an equilibrium length l0 = 47 cm. When the springs are in equilibrium, they line up vertically. Suppose that the cup containing the mass is pulled to x = 0.8 m to the left of the vertical and then released.

(a) Determine the system's total mechanical energy.
(b) Determine the speed of the stone at x = 0.


Homework Equations


Potential Elastic Energy: PE = (1/2)kx2
Conservation of energy: 1/2mv2 + (1/2)kx2 = 1/2mv2 + (1/2)kx2


The Attempt at a Solution


This is really tough for me. I'm really not sure how to approach this.

Starting with problem a...
There are two springs and the system is not in motion initially. We know that total mechanic energy is change in K + change in PE.

The equation would be E = (0) + kx2 = (57)(.8) = 45.6 J note I didn't make it (1/2)kx^2 because there are 2 springs.

This is not the correct answer. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 6-p-047-alt.gif
    6-p-047-alt.gif
    6 KB · Views: 772
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to square x, but x is not 0.8. The springs stretch more than that, use some geometry to calculate the change in length of the springs.
 
Oh, wow. You are totally right. I didn't think that the change in x would be in the diagonal direction.

so it would be:
sqroot(0.472 + 0.82) = 0.9278 m

(57)(0.9278)2 = 49.066 J

However, that is still the wrong answer : /
What am I missing?

Edit: You told me to find the change in x, and that's not what I was doing. Instead it should be
0.9278 - 0.47 = 0.4578 m

0.45782*57 = 11.96 J. That is the correct answer for a. : )

Now to part B:
there is no initial kinetic energy, but there is definitely final kinetic energy. Also, at the end of the equation. There is no final PE, so it would be 0. I feel like I should use the conservation of energy here. What I have is:

0 + 0.45782*57 = (1/2)mv2 + 0
solving for this, I get v = 4.89 m/s. This is the right answer again. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Hi, I am working on a very similar problem. I was wondering why the stone in the cup is not considered in the total mechanical energy of the system, when it seems to have potential energy?
 
You make a good observation, but it is not the gravitational PE that it is important, since it is referenced to an arbitrary axis, but rather, the change in gravitational PE that matters, as the the stone moves from its initial position to its 'final' position at x = 0, assuming that the slingshot is in a vertical plane. In this problem, this change is small, which would not be the case for example, if the stone had a very large mass much greater than 1 kg. Good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K