What Idea Shapes Your Political Philosophy?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the foundational ideas that shape individual political philosophies, with participants referencing key documents like the U.S. Constitution and the Canadian Constitution. A significant emphasis is placed on personal accountability, moral imperatives, and the balance between freedom and government intervention. Participants express diverse views, from a commitment to capitalism and ethical libertarianism to critiques of liberal political philosophy and the need for social justice. The conversation highlights the importance of questioning established norms and encourages self-education to understand political realities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the U.S. Constitution and its implications on individual rights
  • Familiarity with ethical libertarianism and its principles
  • Knowledge of moral philosophy, particularly the Moral Imperative
  • Awareness of historical political philosophies, including Marxism and empiricism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Tenth Amendment in U.S. Constitutional law
  • Explore the concept of ethical libertarianism and its application in modern politics
  • Study the Canadian Constitution, focusing on the right to conscience
  • Investigate the historical context of political philosophies such as Marxism and their critiques
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political theorists, students of political science, activists focused on social justice, and anyone interested in the philosophical underpinnings of governance and individual rights.

  • #91
Skyhunter said:
Everyone and everything belongs.
Society should strive to assure every individual the freedom and opportunity to find their place. I don't know how society will get there. Presently I am not sold on any particular ideology. I am willing to consider any idea, so long as it does not contradict that premise.
You know that's a very functionalist perspective, almost Vaneschian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Smurf said:
You know that's a very functionalist perspective, almost Vaneschian.
Perhaps I should read the threads where you and Vanesch discussed ideology.
 
  • #93
Nah, I can give you an overview of both our positions if you want though.
 
  • #94
Smurf said:
Nah, I can give you an overview of both our positions if you want though.
Sure, that would be acceptable to me, and Vanesch could always object if you mischaracterize his position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K