What if Cramer's FTL Experiment Worked?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peter0302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ftl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cramer's FTL (Faster-Than-Light) experiment, if successful, would significantly impact quantum mechanics (QM) interpretations, particularly supporting the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) while challenging realistic interpretations. The discussion highlights two potential outcomes of sending signals back in time: either the signals are unaffected by past events or they cause a retroactive split in the multiverse. Participants question whether any single-universe interpretation can withstand the implications of retrocausality, particularly in relation to Cramer's theories. The consensus leans towards MWI's compatibility with backward-in-time communication, suggesting a fundamental shift in understanding QM.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics (QM) principles
  • Familiarity with Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI)
  • Knowledge of John Cramer's retrocausality concept
  • Basic grasp of quantum communication theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of retrocausality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) in depth
  • Investigate John Cramer's theories and their critiques
  • Study the effects of FTL communication on classical physics assumptions
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the implications of retrocausality and the interpretations of quantum mechanics.

peter0302
Messages
876
Reaction score
3
I hope this isn't considered too speculative for your guidelines, but I'm very interested to hear what people think would be the implications for QM if Cramer's FTL experiment actually worked. Would it prove or disprove any of the current interrpetations (transactional, Bohmian, MWI)?

My thoughts were that it would tend to support MWI and refute any realistic interpretations of QM. If you can send a signal backwards in time, there are only two ways to avoid a paradox: 1) the only signals that can be sent successfully are ones that will not be affected by anything in the past; or 2) the sending of the signal causes a "retroactive" split in the multiverse, where the split occurs at the moment the signal is received.

Can any single-universe / realistic interpretation of QM survive if Cramer's "retrocausality" machine worked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thought John Cramer's interpretation was single universe?
Atleast that's what I got from his email
 
It is, and I don't see how that can be reconciled with true BIT communication. Does the wavefunction of the entire universe change when a message is sent back in time to reflect the consequences of that message? The whole idea makes way too many classical assumptions. MWi would accommodate BIT perfectly fine, though, because the universe would split at the "time" the message is received, and the sender's universe would be unaffected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 225 ·
8
Replies
225
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K