Is Gravitational Wave a Projection of Quantum Wave if ER = EPR?

philton
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If ER==EPR
Then IsPossible(gravitational wave == projection of quantum wave)

In other words:
If the conjecture of "ER = EPR" is true,
is it possible that "gravitational wave = 3+1 dimensional part of quantum wave" is also true?

2. Homework Equations

The quantum source of space-time
http://www.nature.com/news/the-quantum-source-of-space-time-1.18797

Cool horizons for entangled black holes, J. Maldacena, and L. Susskind
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...ionid=95519C344758B59645E88FD8046B8421.f04t02

The Attempt at a Solution


Casual discussion, brain storming
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philton said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Casual discussion, brain storming
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!
philton said:
is it possible that "gravitational wave = 3+1 dimensional part of quantum wave" is also true?
The first article you linked is similar to holographic theory, how the information of matter in a given volume can be encoded in the "surface" of the boundary. The "spin network" system used in LQG somehow keeps track of differences in sides of NOT identical triangles into pentagrams or tetrahedra or who knows I don't really have much more than a basic concept of it. I'm simply throwing out some examples of theories with some scientific backing which is all that PF rules allows to be discussed, you can get points! for reading the forum rules then you'll know much more of what you can learn here!
 
jerromyjon said:
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!

I guess this is what Susskind sets as homework o0)
 
jerromyjon said:
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!
This post was originally in the homework section of the forum, then it was transferred here.
 
atyy said:
I guess this is what Susskind sets as homework o0)
Isn't he the guy that insisted an answer was incorrect even knowing that he himself gave incorrect information? I'm not saying I disagree with him, you fail for your own inability to conclude facts logically, not someone else's.
 
philton said:
This post was originally in the homework section of the forum, then it was transferred here.
So are you still seeking answers or dissatisfied with what you found?
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
15K
Replies
45
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top