What if light were influenced by gravity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the influence of gravity on light, specifically how light does not travel in a straight line due to gravitational effects. Key concepts such as refraction, diffraction, and gravitational lensing are explored, emphasizing that light follows geodesics in curved spacetime. The conversation highlights the distinction between local and global perceptions of light's path, illustrating that while light appears to travel straight over short distances, it is actually curved in the presence of massive objects. The implications of these phenomena are significant for understanding general relativity and astrophysics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and spacetime concepts
  • Familiarity with light behavior in different mediums, including refraction and diffraction
  • Knowledge of gravitational lensing and its implications in astrophysics
  • Basic grasp of geodesics and their role in curved space
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "gravitational lensing" and its applications in astronomy
  • Study "Huygens' principle" and its relevance to wave propagation
  • Explore "null geodesics" in the context of Schwarzschild spacetime
  • Investigate the "photon sphere" around black holes and its significance
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, physicists, and students of general relativity who seek to understand the interaction between light and gravity, as well as those interested in the implications of these concepts in observational astronomy.

  • #31
PeroK said:
Now that one really is a straight line!
Well, yes. Poor example. I should have used the example of a ball thrown horizontally. But even falling straight down (in the Earth-centered-Earth-fixed coordinate system) is not straight in a non-rotating inertial coordinate system, so it is an example of something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dr_Zinj said:
A straight line is a mathematical concept.

Okay. But so are all curved lines.

Doesn't actually exist in our universe if you take into account all influences on a moving object,

What is your point? That objects don't move in straight lines or curved lines, either? No, I doubt it. I think the issue is that the mathematical concept is a model, and the motion of the object is the thing being modeled. Of course the former is an approximation of the latter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
682
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K