What is 3-Digit Floating Point Arithmetic and How Does It Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brandy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
AI Thread Summary
3-digit floating point arithmetic refers to the representation of numbers using a 3-digit mantissa and an exponent, rather than simply rounding to three decimals or significant figures. The discussion highlights the importance of how numbers are processed, emphasizing that each number in calculations can be represented with a 3-digit format from the start or rounded to three digits at the end. The context involves understanding catastrophic cancellation in quadratic equations, where precision is crucial. It is noted that while calculators may use more digits internally, the focus on 3-digit arithmetic simplifies the example for human calculation. Clarity in questions is essential for deeper understanding of the topic.
brandy
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
what is 3(or i, where i=1,2,3,4...∞) digit arithmetic? is it just working with 3 decimals or 3 significant figures? or is it base 3 arithmetic?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
brandy said:
what is 3(or i, where i=1,2,3,4...∞) digit arithmetic? is it just working with 3 decimals or 3 significant figures? or is it base 3 arithmetic?

Context?

The expression could mean anything.

But if I heard someone say they could do 3 digit arithmetic, I would assume they could add subtract and multiply 3-digit numbers (100-999).
 
the context was talking about floating point numbers and catastrophic cancellation in the quadratic equation.

it said using 3 digit arithmetic:
*subs in some numbers, 0.2, 100.9 etc into the quad equation and at the end rounds the entire number to 3 digits*

am i right in assuming that all the numbers used to input had to be 3 decimals and then the final number had to be 3 digits?
or does every number in the process have to be rounded to 3 decimals as the number is created? step by step?
 
Of course, any decent calculator or computer will carry 12 or more digits for its calculations. But just to give a simple example, that a human could calculate easily, of how cancellation happens, they are restricting to three digits. I don't see any difference between using three digits from the outset and rounding to three digits.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I don't see any difference between using three digits from the outset and rounding to three digits.
What? Of course there's a difference.
 
Since the context is floating point arithmetic, my guess at what you're asking is that numbers are represented by a 3-digit mantissa and an exponent.

Using the numbers you gave as examples, 0.2 would be 2.00 x 10-1 and 100.9 would be 1.01 x 102.

If you want a better answer, you'll need to ask a question that is clearer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top