What is a Contour? Complex Analysis Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Simple question, this word keeps popping up in complex analysis but my book hasn't given an exact definition of what a contour is. Is it just a region in the complex plane bounded by a curve? So when the books says for instance "integrate over a contour" is that equivalent to just integrating over a closed surface in ℝ2?

Another question which also troubles me quite a bit:

Due to the cauchy riemann relations we have:

[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = 0

But still I often see things like: "Consider two closed contours A and B in the argand diagram, B being sufficiently small that it lies completely within C. Show that if f(z) is analytic in the region between the two contours then:
[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = [itex]\oint[/itex]Bf(z)dz
But shouldn't that be obvious since they are both equal to zero?
 
on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
Simple question, this word keeps popping up in complex analysis but my book hasn't given an exact definition of what a contour is. Is it just a region in the complex plane bounded by a curve? So when the books says for instance "integrate over a contour" is that equivalent to just integrating over a closed surface in ℝ2?

Another question which also troubles me quite a bit:

Due to the cauchy riemann relations we have:

[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = 0

But still I often see things like: "Consider two closed contours A and B in the argand diagram, B being sufficiently small that it lies completely within C. Show that if f(z) is analytic in the region between the two contours then:
[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = [itex]\oint[/itex]Bf(z)dz
But shouldn't that be obvious since they are both equal to zero?

The contour integral is zero if f(z) is analytic inside the contour. But suppose f has a pole inside the contour. That is the situation being considered in your last example. Both contour integrals will give the same non-zero answer.
 
aaaa202 said:
Simple question, this word keeps popping up in complex analysis but my book hasn't given an exact definition of what a contour is. Is it just a region in the complex plane bounded by a curve? So when the books says for instance "integrate over a contour" is that equivalent to just integrating over a closed surface in ℝ2?

Another question which also troubles me quite a bit:

Due to the cauchy riemann relations we have:

[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = 0

But still I often see things like: "Consider two closed contours A and B in the argand diagram, B being sufficiently small that it lies completely within C. Show that if f(z) is analytic in the region between the two contours then:
[itex]\oint[/itex]Cf(z)dz = [itex]\oint[/itex]Bf(z)dz
But shouldn't that be obvious since they are both equal to zero?

Contours are curves, not regions. Typically, a "contour integral" refers to an integral over a closed curve.

RGV