What is a relation and how is it defined on a set?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
icantadd
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a seemingly subtle point here, that would actually clear up both of the two previous posts I have made. A relation R is said to be defined on S and T if [tex]s \in S[/tex] and [tex]s \in dom(R)[/tex].

Homework Equations


na


The Attempt at a Solution


Does this mean, that if I see a question that starts if R is defined on S ... that I can assume if I define a relation on S, call it T, that the domain of T must also be S. Or for any relation that we define on a set, it can be assumed that the domain of the relation is that set?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi icantadd! :smile:

Sorry, I'm not following any of that. :confused:

A relation on S is a subset of S x S.

From the PF Library page on relation …
A relation on a set A is a subset R of [tex]A \times A[/tex].
For a relation [tex]R \subseteq A\times A,~\text{and}~x, y \in A[/tex], we say xRy, i.e. x is related to y, if [tex]\left(x,y\right ) \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

:smile:
 
icantadd said:

Homework Statement


This is a seemingly subtle point here, that would actually clear up both of the two previous posts I have made. A relation R is said to be defined on S and T if [tex]s \in S[/tex] and [tex]s \in dom(R)[/tex].

Homework Equations


na


The Attempt at a Solution


Does this mean, that if I see a question that starts if R is defined on S ... that I can assume if I define a relation on S, call it T, that the domain of T must also be S. Or for any relation that we define on a set, it can be assumed that the domain of the relation is that set?
A relation on S is any subset of the cartesian product SxS, the set of ordered pairs of objects from S. It does not follow from that that every member of S must be in some ordered pair. For example, I could define R on Z, the set of integers by "xRy is x and y are both odd numbers" That would consist of things like (1, 1), (3, 5), (-3, 7), etc. That is also of course, a relation on "O", the set of odd integers. If R is a relation on both sets S and T, the members of the pairs of R must be contained in both S and T: some subset of the intersection of S and T.