What is a "Torsional Constant"?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the "torsional constant" in the context of rotational dynamics and oscillations. Participants are exploring the formulas related to angular frequency and the relationship between torque and angular displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the justification of the formula ω=√(C/I) and how the torsional constant C is defined and applied. Questions arise regarding the meaning of C and its relationship to other formulas, as well as the implications of angular acceleration and energy in the context of torsional motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the definitions and relationships of the variables involved. Some participants suggest analogies to linear springs to clarify the concept of torque and energy storage in torsional systems. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of changing angular velocity and its connection to the formulas presented.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion over terminology, particularly between "torsional constant" and "torsion coefficient." Participants are also discussing the dimensions of C and its relation to energy and torque, indicating a need for clarity on these concepts.

Gourab_chill
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I don't have much idea on what torsional constant means.
Relevant Equations
ω=√(C/I); here C is the torsional constant
ω'=ωβ; this formula which I saw in the solutions is related to the amplitude of the system.
The question was:

Capture.PNG


I will also include the solution:

Capture1.PNG


So, what is the justification of the first formula [ω=√(C/I)]? I know how to derive simple harmonic equations, this one as I guess is probably similar? But I cannot connect as to how C is used exactly.

And the second formula [ω'=ωβ], I don't know why is it used; I'm clueless about it. Can you throw some light on these topics?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Gourab_chill said:
Homework Statement:: I don't have much idea on what torsional constant means.
Relevant Equations:: ω=√(C/I); here C is the torsional constant
ω'=ωβ; this formula which I saw in the solutions is related to the amplitude of the system.

The question was:

View attachment 266508

I will also include the solution:

View attachment 266509

So, what is the justification of the first formula [ω=√(C/I)]? I know how to derive simple harmonic equations, this one as I guess is probably similar? But I cannot connect as to how C is used exactly.

And the second formula [ω'=ωβ], I don't know why is it used; I'm clueless about it. Can you throw some light on these topics?
I can explain the ##\beta, \omega, \omega_0## part.
The two ##\omega##s represent quite different things. ##\omega## is the angular frequency, i.e. as in ##\sin(\omega t)##. For a rotational oscillation, as here, there is also the rate of change of angular position. So if ##\beta## is the angular amplitude then ##\theta=\beta\sin(\omega t)## and ##\dot\theta=\beta\omega\cos(\omega t)##.
They have, confusingly, used ##\omega_0## for the amplitude of ##\dot\theta##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Gourab_chill
haruspex said:
I can explain the ##\beta, \omega, \omega_0## part.
The two ##\omega##s represent quite different things. ##\omega## is the angular frequency, i.e. as in ##\sin(\omega t)##. For a rotational oscillation, as here, there is also the rate of change of angular position. So if ##\beta## is the angular amplitude then ##\theta=\beta\sin(\omega t)## and ##\dot\theta=\beta\omega\cos(\omega t)##.
They have, confusingly, used ##\omega_0## for the amplitude of ##\dot\theta##.
Thanks, now I understand it! What are your views on the first equation [ ω=√(C/I) ]? That equation seems familiar to the other ones like ω=√(mgd/I), I'm confused on what exactly C means.
 
Gourab_chill said:
Thanks, now I understand it! What are your views on the first equation [ ω=√(C/I) ]? That equation seems familiar to the other ones like ω=√(mgd/I), I'm confused on what exactly C means.
I can't make sense of that one. All the references I see on the web , like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_constant, give it dimension ##L^4##. It is similar to second moment of area, but is less easily calculated and is specific to the way a cross section reacts to torque.
The use of C above gives it the same dimensions as energy (!).
 
After a bit more research, looks like there's a confusion over terminology.
Wikipedia use "torsion coefficient" for what the question above calls torsional constant.
See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_spring.
It represents the energy stored in the structure per radian of twist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gourab_chill
haruspex said:
After a bit more research, looks like there's a confusion over terminology.
Wikipedia use "torsion coefficient" for what the question above calls torsional constant.
See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_spring.
It represents the energy stored in the structure per radian of twist.
Thanks again!
So Cθ = Iα is the equation, and therefore ω^2=C/I.
 
First, a correction. As with force in a linear spring, torque rises in proportion to the twist, so energy rises as the square of the twist.
Gourab_chill said:
Thanks again!
So Cθ = Iα is the equation, and therefore ω^2=C/I.
What is ##\alpha## there?

In the question, the max angular speed is ##\beta\omega##, so the max KE is ##\frac 12I\beta^2\omega^2##.
The max twist of the fibre is ##\beta##, so the max torsional energy is ##\frac 12C\beta^2##. These must be equal, so we have ##C=I\omega^2##.
 
haruspex said:
First, a correction. As with force in a linear spring, torque rises in proportion to the twist, so energy rises as the square of the twist.

What is ##\alpha## there?

In the question, the max angular speed is ##\beta\omega##, so the max KE is ##\frac 12I\beta^2\omega^2##.
The max twist of the fibre is ##\beta##, so the max torsional energy is ##\frac 12C\beta^2##. These must be equal, so we have ##C=I\omega^2##.

Since this pendulum is spinning it is coming to rest and then going the opposite way(harmonic motion i mean) so there is some some force in the wire which causes it to accelerate in the opposite direction, and therefore there must be some angular acceleration, right?
 
Gourab_chill said:
Since this pendulum is spinning it is coming to rest and then going the opposite way(harmonic motion i mean) so there is some some force in the wire which causes it to accelerate in the opposite direction, and therefore there must be some angular acceleration, right?
Ok, but you had not mentioned acceleration before.
Yes, and ##\theta## is the angular displacement so ##C\theta## is the torque.
So to complete my correction, think of C as like the k for a spring: it's the torque per unit twist, and the stored energy is ##\frac 12C\theta^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gourab_chill
  • #10
haruspex said:
Ok, but you had not mentioned acceleration before.
Yes, and ##\theta## is the angular displacement so ##C\theta## is the torque.
So to complete my correction, think of C as like the k for a spring: it's the torque per unit twist, and the stored energy is ##\frac 12C\theta^2##.
Yes, I agree to this analogy too.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
First, a correction. As with force in a linear spring, torque rises in proportion to the twist, so energy rises as the square of the twist.

What is ##\alpha## there?

In the question, the max angular speed is ##\beta\omega##, so the max KE is ##\frac 12I\beta^2\omega^2##.
The max twist of the fibre is ##\beta##, so the max torsional energy is ##\frac 12C\beta^2##. These must be equal, so we have ##C=I\omega^2##.

I have a bit confusion as I overlooked a few things(my bad):
I thought the given angular velocity(ω0) shouldn't change but here as in the solutions I see they're considering ω0 to change with ω = √(C/I) [as ω0= ωβsin(ωt)]! Please explain me a bit here.
 
  • #12
Gourab_chill said:
as ω0= ωβsin(ωt)
Where are you getting that from?
In the extract you quoted in post #1 it says ω0= ωβ, all constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K