What is an Example of a Matrix with Geometric Multiplicity Greater Than 1?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating an example of a matrix with geometric multiplicity greater than 1. The matrix A is defined as A = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & 4 & 2 \\ 4 & 5 & 2 \\ 2 & 2 & 2 \end{pmatrix} with a determinant of 10 and a characteristic polynomial of -((x-10)(x-1)^2). The eigenvalues are 10 and 1, with both algebraic and geometric multiplicities equal to 2 for the eigenvalue 1. The discussion emphasizes that geometric multiplicity can exceed 1, countering the common misconception that it is always 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, specifically row reduction
  • Concept of algebraic and geometric multiplicity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvalues in linear algebra
  • Learn about the relationship between algebraic and geometric multiplicity
  • Explore matrix row reduction techniques in detail
  • Investigate additional examples of matrices with varying geometric multiplicities
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking clear examples of geometric multiplicity in matrices.

njl86
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
after finding out what geometric multiplicity was, I was surprised to notice that in every question I'd done it was always 1.
So I'm trying to prove an example with g.m. > 1 to see why it works.
I've found a matrix which definitely has an eigenvalue with g.m. = 2. I've checked everything with WolframAlpha, so the following is correct:

Matrix A =
<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 5 &amp; 4 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 4 &amp; 5 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 2 &amp; 2 &amp; 2 \end{array} \right)
Determinant = 10

Characteristic polynomial = -((x-10) (x-1)^2)

So eigenvalues =
10
1 < -- with a.m. = 2, and g.m. = 2

So find the eigenvectors to find I'd start with:
(A - 1 * I ) v = 0, the matrix being:
<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 4 &amp; 4 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 4 &amp; 4 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 2 &amp; 2 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is certainly not true that the geometric multiplicity is always 1 for each eigenvalue. All you know is that the geometric multiplicity is always less than or equal to the algebraic multiplicity; there is nothing that says, however, that the geometric multiplicity must be 1. Recall that if ##A## is a matrix and ##\lambda## is an eigenvalue of ##A## then the geometric multiplicity of ##\lambda## is ##\dim E_{\lambda}## where ##E_{\lambda}## is the associated eigenspace.

As a simple counter example, consider ##A = I##. The only eigenvalue of ##I## is ##\lambda = 1 ## and every ##v\in \mathbb{R}^{n}## is an eigenvector of ##I## so ##E_{\lambda = 1} = \mathbb{R}^{n}## which has a geometric multiplicity of ##n## which is not 1 in general.
 
WannabeNewton said:
It is certainly not true that the geometric multiplicity is always 1 for each eigenvalue.
I know, I was just looking for a normal example that showed otherwise.
Thank you for your counter example

How do I continue with my method?
 
Well your example is also quite easy in fact. Taking ##B = \begin{pmatrix}
4 & 4 &2 \\
4& 4 &2 \\
2 & 2 & 1
\end{pmatrix}##
we can very easily put this in reduced row echelon form as ##C = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 &0 \\
0& 0 &0 \\
2 & 2 & 1
\end{pmatrix}##. Thus, the solutions to ##Cv = 0## are given by ##v_{1},v_{2} = \text{arbitrary}## and ##v_{3} = -2v_1 -2v_2## where ##v = (v_1,v_2,v_3)^{T}##. Therefore, setting ##v_1 = t,v_2 = s##, we can write any ##v\in \text{Null}C## as ##v = t(1,0,-2)^{T} + s(0,1,-2)^{T}## i.e. ##E_{\lambda = 1} = \text{Null}C = \text{Span}\{(1,0,-2)^{T},(0,1,-2)^{T}\}## which of course has a geometric multiplicity of 2.
 
Last edited:
I see how it works now, thank you
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K