Undergrad What is an observable exactly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observable
Click For Summary
An observable in quantum mechanics is defined as a Hermitian operator within a specific Hilbert space. The discussion highlights the ambiguity surrounding wave function collapse, noting that interpretations of quantum mechanics vary on whether it occurs and how it manifests. Equipment used for quantum measurements includes photodetectors, magnets, polarizers, and waveplates, depending on the specific measurements being taken. The size of the region into which the wave function collapses during measurement remains a subject of debate. Understanding observables and their measurement is crucial for interpreting quantum phenomena accurately.
dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
What is an observable exactly? I hear terms that are used in physics books like an observable or a detection. What types of equipment do physicists use to make all these quantum measurements that are used in books so frequently? How small of a region of space does the wave function "collapse" into when measuring particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dsaun777 said:
How small of a region of space does the wave function "collapse" into when measuring particles?
Whether wave function collapse happens at all is an open question (different interpretations of quantum mechanics say different things on this topic).
 
dsaun777 said:
What types of equipment do physicists use to make all these quantum measurements that are used in books so frequently?
One example of equipment is photodetectors. But there are other types of equipment used, depending on what is studied. Examples of additional equipment: magnets, polarizers, waveplates etc.
 
Technically, an observable is just a Hermitian operator on whatever Hilbert space you're working in.
 

Thread 'One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics'

I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergrad Is There A Study Showing The Observer Effect Ignoring Conscious Intent?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Undergrad Mean values of observables
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
High School Can someone please explain to me the motion of an electron?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
High School Quantum entanglement and simultaneity
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad States and observables in quantum mechanics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Undergrad The physical components in the electron double slit experiment
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Graduate Does Causality in QFT Require Commuting Field Operators Outside the Light Cone?
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Undergrad Double slit experiment with observer
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Graduate Can particles appear and disappear "with" a cause?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Feedback on Educational Script: What's a particle in QFT?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K