What Is Kinetic Energy? Explained Simply

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy is defined as the energy associated with motion, allowing an object to apply force over a distance when it decelerates. It can be understood through the relationship with potential energy, where energy is conserved as an object moves, such as a ball being thrown upward. The concept is rooted in classical mechanics, where kinetic energy is derived from the work done on an object, represented by the equation W = Fd. In special relativity, the perception of kinetic energy varies among different observers due to their relative velocities. Overall, kinetic energy is a fundamental concept in physics that illustrates the conversion of energy forms during motion.
yaseen shah
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
would anyone deeply tell me what is kinetic energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think kinetic energy is something you invent to have a number - instead of the vectorial momentum - which together with the invention potential energy is constant over time.

At classically speaking it seems to be so. More answers could come from special relativity.
 
Energy is the capacity to do work, and work is force times distance. Kinetic energy is the capacity that something has to apply a force over a distance by slowing down. For example, a bullet is going very fast and can hit a target and decelerate rapidly thereby applying a large force over some distance.
 
You can get some insight into KE from an introductory physics text which derives it from
W = Fd = max...a change in velocity of a mass times a distance traveled.

the KE of a body in motion is equal to the work it can do as it is brought to rest...so it's based on a useful, convenient definition.

For a deeper understanding, check the relationship with potential energy (PE) because in some instances they are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign...as in throwing a ball vertically in the air for example...when the decreasing velocity (decreasing KE) is replaced by an equal increase in magnitude of PE as the ball rises. Things reverse as it falls.

In relativity, things get more complex because each inertial (constant velocity) observer measures the apparent velocity of an object differently...so each thinks (correctly) the object has a different KE.

Parts of the Wikipedia write up on KINETIC ENERGY are easy to understand; some are opaque.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

from a post above: "...which together with the invention potential energy is constant over time... not sure exactly what this means, but in general it is not accurate.; see my example where this is true...with regard to a ball rolling on a flat surface, it is NOT.
 
Last edited:
yaseen shah said:
would anyone deeply tell me what is kinetic energy.

It's the energy associated with motion, as opposed to potential energy, which is associated with position. For example, if you're standing still holding a soccer ball in your hands, the ball has potential energy. In other words, it's got the "potential" to do something (to fall to the ground). Once you release the ball, the ball's potential energy is converted into kinetic energy since the ball is moving under the influence of gravity.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top