What is Lambert W (e^\xi-1=x\xi) Function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CRGreathouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the function defined by the equation e^ξ - 1 = xξ, where ξ is the positive root and x is a constant. Participants explore its properties, potential naming, and behavior, particularly in relation to the Lambert W function and its logarithmic characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the function resembles Lambert's W and suggests it is logarithmic in the limit.
  • Another participant challenges the clarity of the definition provided, arguing that it lacks context and a proper definition before the "where."
  • A different participant mentions having provided a solution to the function elsewhere, indicating a lack of consensus on its naming.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the definition of the function, with one participant asserting it defines a family of functions for each value of x, while another questions its clarity.
  • One participant expresses interest in the function's behavior around small values, suggesting that it may not be logarithmic in that range and seeks characterization methods.
  • Another participant proposes a relation involving the Lambert W function and asks about the appropriate branch to consider for positive x.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the naming or definitive properties of the function. Multiple competing views and uncertainties about its definition and behavior remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the function's single-valued nature on the reals and its definition for all positive reals. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in mathematical definitions and the implications of different branches of the Lambert W function.

CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I ran across a function and wondered if it's named. It reminds me of Lambert's W. I quote from my source (van de Lune and Wattel 1969):

where [itex]\xi[/itex] is the positive root of [itex]e^\xi-1=x\xi[/itex]

Here [itex]x[/itex] is a constant for our purposes.

The function is essentially logarithmic in the limit, as is clear from its definition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Where [itex]\zeta[/itex] is the positive root of [itex]e^{/zeta}- 1= x/zeta[/itex]" doesn't define anything! Surely there was a definition before the "where"!
 
Don't know what it's called, but I gave a solution of it elsewhere[sosmath.com] (sorry 'bout the plug for a rival website :wink: ).
 
HallsofIvy said:
"Where [itex]\zeta[/itex] is the positive root of [itex]e^{/zeta}- 1= x/zeta[/itex]" doesn't define anything! Surely there was a definition before the "where"!

Huh? First of all, that's not what I wrote; in addition to the typographic difference (I used xi, you used zeta) you divide where I multiply. But it does define a function* -- or rather a family of functions, one for each value of x. The function is [itex]f_x:\mathbb{R}^+\to\mathbb{R}[/itex], defined by

[tex]f_x(z)=\xi \Leftrightarrow e^\xi-1=x\xi[/tex]

Of course this definition doesn't show that the function is single-valued on the reals, nor that it's defined for all positive reals, or the like... that's one reason I'd like to find out if there are 'known properties' of this function.

* And it's a good thing, too, since the thing that comes before the "where" was another function defined using [itex]\xi[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Matthew Rodman said:
Don't know what it's called, but I gave a solution of it elsewhere[sosmath.com]

OK, so you suggest

[tex]-\xi=\frac1x+W\left(\frac{-\exp(-1/x)}{x}\right)[/tex]

Any thought on which branch to take? The W should be defined on both branches for x > 0.
 
Last edited:
CRGreathouse said:
where [itex]\xi[/itex] is the positive root of [itex]e^\xi-1=x\xi[/itex]

Here [itex]x[/itex] is a constant for our purposes.

The function is essentially logarithmic in the limit, as is clear from its definition.

Actually I'm interested in the behavior of the function around small values, maybe 3 to 20. In this neighborhood it's not really logarithmic -- any thoughts on how best to characterize it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
22K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K