What is Negative Work and Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of negative work and energy, exploring definitions, examples, and interpretations within the context of physics. Participants engage in clarifying the conditions under which work is considered negative or positive, particularly in relation to gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that negative work is work done in the opposite direction of motion, such as friction acting against a moving object.
  • One participant suggests that lifting an object involves doing negative work against gravity, while another counters that this is positive work since the force and motion are in the same direction.
  • A later reply clarifies that lowering an object while holding it involves doing negative work, as the force is upward while the motion is downward.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that "you do negative work on an object" can be viewed as "the object does positive work on you," using the example of a grandfather clock's weight.
  • Some participants challenge the application of work in the context of the grandfather clock, arguing that the clock does not move, and thus the weight does no work on it.
  • One participant emphasizes that context matters when discussing work, suggesting that lifting an object can be seen as gravity doing negative work on the object, while simultaneously the participant does positive work.
  • There is a reiteration of the idea that both lifting and lowering an object can be framed in terms of positive and negative work depending on the perspective taken.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on the definitions and examples of negative work, with multiple competing views remaining unresolved. Some participants clarify their positions, but no consensus is reached on the interpretations of work done against gravity.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various texts and lectures to support their claims, indicating that interpretations may depend on different educational sources and contexts. The discussion highlights the complexity of defining work in physics, particularly in relation to gravitational forces.

fogvajarash
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
How can we define negative work to be? I can't get my head around negative work or energy. However, I'm thinking that it must be work that is done opposite in the direction of motion of a particle or body (say, friction). Could someone please help me understand this concept?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah. I'll give you a simple example hopefully you understand. If you pick up and object with weight you are doing negative work against gravity. If you let go of the object gravity is doing positive work.
 
PhysicsKid0123 said:
If you pick up and object with weight you are doing negative work against gravity.

No, in this case the work you do is positive. The force you exert and the direction of motion are in the same direction: both upwards.

If you lower an object while holding it in your hand, then you do negative work on the object. In this case the force is still upwards, but the direction of motion is downwards, i.e. in opposite directions.

Another way to look at it is that "you do negative work on an object" is equivalent to "the object does positive work on you." Practical application: the weight that drives a grandfather clock. The clock does negative work on the weight, and the weight does positive work on the clock, as the weight is slowly lowered.
 
Have a look..
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0006.jpg
    DSC_0006.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 532
jtbell said:
Another way to look at it is that "you do negative work on an object" is equivalent to "the object does positive work on you." Practical application: the weight that drives a grandfather clock. The clock does negative work on the weight, and the weight does positive work on the clock, as the weight is slowly lowered.

That's not right. The weight does no work on the clock because the clock is not moving. The law of action and reaction doesn't transfer from forces to work because the work also depend on whether or not the object on which the force acts is moving (displacement).
 
jtbell said:
Practical application: the weight that drives a grandfather clock. The driven pulley of the clock does negative work on the weight, and the weight does positive work on the driven pulley of the clock, as the weight is slowly lowered.

dauto said:
That's not right. The weight does no work on the clock because the clock is not moving. The law of action and reaction doesn't transfer from forces to work because the work also depend on whether or not the object on which the force acts is moving (displacement).

Suppose I changed jtbell's statement to add the text in boldface above... then it would be right (and I expect that's what he intended anyways).
 
Yes, the clock as a whole does not move, so I made a poor choice of words.
 
So what was wrong with my statement again?
 
PhysicsKid0123 said:
So what was wrong with my statement again?

PhysicsKid0123 said:
If you pick up and object with weight you are doing negative work against gravity.
Since the force you exert and the displacement are both upward, you are doing positive work.

If you let go of the object gravity is doing positive work.
When the object falls, gravity does positive work.
 
  • #10
But doesn't it depend what context you say you're doing work? The example I gave was relative to gravity. You are saying exactly what I'm saying. I said and you said gravity does positive work when letting go. Okay that is settled. Now if you pick up an object you are doing positive work. Another way to say that which has the same physical meaning is that picking up an object is equivalent to gravity doing negative work on the object since gravity is a conservative force. I do positive work, simultaneously gravity does negative work. Gravity does positive work, simultaneously I do negative work when lowering down the object. I know this because I read three different texts and saw Walter Lewin explain it in his classical mechanics lecture. Do you see what I am saying?
 
  • #11
PhysicsKid0123 said:
But doesn't it depend what context you say you're doing work? The example I gave was relative to gravity. You are saying exactly what I'm saying. I said and you said gravity does positive work when letting go. Okay that is settled. Now if you pick up an object you are doing positive work. Another way to say that which has the same physical meaning is that picking up an object is equivalent to gravity doing negative work on the object since gravity is a conservative force. I do positive work, gravity does negative work. Gravity does positive work, I do negative work. I know this because I read three different texts and saw Walter Lewin explain it in his classical mechanics lecture. Do you see what I am saying?
All good.

So why didn't you say that the first time? :wink: Read what you actually wrote earlier.

You said that when you pick up an object you do negative work against gravity, which was incorrect. As you said correctly in your last post, you do positive work against gravity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K