What is stuied in Nuclear Engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the curriculum and career prospects in Nuclear Engineering, particularly focusing on undergraduate studies at Penn State. Participants explore the content of the degree, the emphasis on fission versus fusion reactors, and the demand for nuclear engineers in the industry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the specific courses and requirements for a Nuclear Engineering degree at Penn State, expressing interest in the balance between fission and fusion studies.
  • Another participant provides a link to Penn State's curriculum, noting that courses cover essential math and physics, with a focus on fission reactors.
  • Some participants suggest that if one is primarily interested in math, pursuing a pure math degree might be more appropriate than engineering.
  • A nuclear engineer emphasizes the increasing demand for professionals in the field due to upcoming retirements and the need for skilled workers in various organizations, including the NRC and DOE.
  • Another participant shares their positive experience visiting the nuclear engineering department and encourages campus visits for prospective students.
  • Discussion includes the potential for math-intensive topics in neutron transport and reactor dynamics, while also mentioning the challenges in securing funding for fusion research.
  • Some participants express optimism about the future of nuclear engineering, citing a "nuclear renaissance" and the anticipated demand for new reactors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views regarding the focus of Nuclear Engineering studies, particularly the balance between fission and fusion. While there is a general consensus on the demand for nuclear engineers, the discussion remains unresolved on the specifics of curriculum content and the future of fusion research funding.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various aspects of the curriculum, including the emphasis on applied mathematics and the potential for different areas of focus within Nuclear Engineering, but do not resolve the specifics of course offerings or the extent of fusion studies available at Penn State.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective students considering a degree in Nuclear Engineering, individuals interested in the nuclear industry, and those exploring the mathematical aspects of engineering disciplines.

php111
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I always wanted to go for an Engineering degree because I want Math.

I am thinking about going for a Nuclear Engineering degree. I live in PA and tail to tail in PA North to South and East to West, there only one College/University offers Nuclear Engineering and it's Penn State.

What is studied in that major as for Undergraduate? What is studied in the Nuclear Reactors? Correct me if I am wrong, I believe Penn State may or may not have the Fusion option? Without having that option does it get into any Fusion? I have been told by someone on this forum to talk to someone from the College and maybe visit the campus.

Before even talking or visiting, I really would like to know what is required in the degree? Let's take the top 5 Engineering degrees. I don't know what the top degrees are but I asked before and never got an answer. Which Engineering degrees has the most Math? I really wasn't looking at Electrical Engineering. Thank you everyone.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here's Penn State's nuclear engineering curriculum: http://www.mne.psu.edu/undergrad/ugmanuals/NucE_Manual/NucE_inside_back_cover.htm

Courses cover the basic math and physics need for more advanced classes, and the advanced classes cover how the reactor operates from the core to the secondary side.

Fusion or a plasma physics course might be a techanical elective you could take, that's what I did, but most undergraduate courses seem to prepare people for working in or with the current nuclear industry, so fission reactors will be studied more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you are truly interested in math, why go into engineering? Just study Math.
 
I'm a nuke engineer, and recommend you go into the field, because in about 5 years there will be a serious brain drain due to retirements and attrition. You'll be in big demand by the NRC, DOE, and nuclear utilities. Not to mention there is always the Int'l Atomic Energy Agency which needs more American staff..
 
php111 said:
I have been told by someone on this forum to talk to someone from the College and maybe visit the campus.

You should visit the department of mechanical and nuclear engineering. I visited about a year ago. During the visit I learned a lot about their program and they took me on a tour of the reactor.
 
stevecaudill said:
I'm a nuke engineer, and recommend you go into the field, because in about 5 years there will be a serious brain drain due to retirements and attrition. You'll be in big demand by the NRC, DOE, and nuclear utilities. Not to mention there is always the Int'l Atomic Energy Agency which needs more American staff..
There's already a brain drain at NRC/DOE/vendors and utilities. Most of the folks who developed the technology 30, 40, 50 years ago are gone. In the US, we haven't started a plant in years, and the last ones were completed and brought on-line in the last 1980's.

Orders have been placed for some large forgings for at least two ABWRs in the US, with several more order for large components pending. On top of that, we're pushing the envelope on current technology.
 
just a note

i remember my instructor once telling me the " Zap Zap and your sterile" and he used to work in the nuclear industry and he was only cationing us in working around a nuclear densitomiter
great industry to work in / a lot of nice people
 
Nuclear Engineering is a great field to be entering... the nuclear renaissance is upon us, with tons of new reactors on order. Basically, you'll be very in demand once you get your degree. As for math, depending on how strongly applied physics based the program you choose is, you can do a lot of math. It's applied math... differential equations and all that, not abstract algebra or anything. If you want to do pure math, do math, not engineering.

Neutron (and charged particles, for medical physics) transport uses a lot of math. That basically involves following neutrons as they pass through materials and react. Lots of math. There are also a lot of equations involved with tracking the neutronics and transients in reactors, though this is basically transport deep down.

Fusion can have a lot of math... especially if you attack it from the plasma physics side, as opposed to the materials/engineering side. However, it's pretty hard to get funding in fusion right now, so you need to take that into consideration, at least for graduate school. You will probably mostly study fission reactors in undergrad, but fusion is really interesting (and is the future, in my opinion), so go to a school with some amount of interest in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 191 ·
7
Replies
191
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K