What is the angular velocity of the two disks combined?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of two combined disks after one is dropped onto the other. The first disk has a mass of 1.6 kg and an initial angular velocity of 55 rad/s, while the second disk has a mass of 0.45 kg and is initially at rest. The conservation of angular momentum is applied, emphasizing the importance of considering the moment of inertia for each disk. The final angular velocity is calculated using the formula for rotational momentum, leading to a result of approximately 49.89 rad/s. The approach taken in the calculations is confirmed as correct by other participants in the discussion.
mastamind518
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.6 kg disk with radius 0.63 m is rotating freely at 55 rad/s around an axis perpendicular to its center. A second disk that is not rotating is dropped onto the first disk so that their centers align, and they stick together. The mass of the second disk is 0.45 kg and its radius is 0.38 m. What is the angular velocity of the two disks combined?
rad/s

m1 = 1.6 Kg
r1 = 0.63 m
w1 = 55 rad/s
m2 = 0.45 Kg
r2 = 0.38 m


Homework Equations



conservation of angular momentum

L=mvr

v=rw

The Attempt at a Solution



i set up the equation as... (m1)(v1)(r1)=(m1r1 + m2r2)(v)

where v1 = r1w1 and v is equal to the linear velocity(which should be same for both?)

I solved for v, and then divided by r1, since that's the radius of the whole system, and got an answer of 47.02rad/s. The answer key says the answer is 50 rad/s...

which concept did i get wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

For rotational momentum don't you want to consider the Moment of Inertia of the disks and not just the mass?

For a solid disk I = 1/2*m*r2
 
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

For rotational momentum don't you want to consider the Moment of Inertia of the disks and not just the mass?

For a solid disk I = 1/2*m*r2

Thanks a lot for that tip...

So by using moment, i would have...

(Iinitial)(winitial) = (Ifinal)(wfinal)

(1/2)(m1)(r1)^2(w1) = (1/2)(m1(r1)^2+m2(r2)^2)(w2) where w2 is the final angular velocity

I get 49.89rad/s for w2...just wanted to confirm i was doing it right...
 
Last edited:
mastamind518 said:
Thanks a lot for that tip...

So by using moment, i would have...

(Iinitial)(winitial) = (Ifinal)(wfinal)

(1/2)(m1)(r1)^2(w1) = (1/2)(m1(r1)^2+m2(r2)^2)(w2) where w2 is the final angular velocity

I get 49.89rad/s for w2...just wanted to confirm i was doing it right...

Without calculating it out, that looks like the right approach.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K