What is the best method for solving this summation equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bj1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a summation equation involving variables x and y, with participants attempting to clarify the problem context and the specifics of the equation presented. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the clarity of the problem, particularly the role of the variable j in the summation and the implications of the values assigned to k, l, and m. There is a suggestion that the equation may represent a matrix relationship, and the original poster is seeking guidance on how to proceed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equation and its components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the equation, but no consensus or definitive approach has been established yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has indicated that no additional instructions or context have been provided beyond the equation itself, which may limit the understanding of the problem's requirements.

bj1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://k1w1.no-ip.info/math.gif

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



A puzzle I'm trying to find a solution to, and have no idea on where to begin. Any pointers, or answers, appreciated. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • math.gif
    math.gif
    984 bytes · Views: 519
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is the problem? You've given an equation but haven't said what problem you are trying to solve.

I also see many difficulties with the equation: you have a sum over j but there is no j in the numbers to be summed. If that is really what you mean then the result is just 5 times kxlym for each l and m. But you also give different values of "k" for each l and m. Did you mean klm rather than just k? Looks to me like your equation becomes a 5 by 5 matrix equation with only some of the 25 entries involving x and y. Are we to assume that klm = 0 for combinations of l and m not in the table?
 
Hi HallsofIvy,

I'm trying to find the values of x & y. The equation is all that has been given, no other instructions or pointers. I'm rapidly learning that it doesn't appear to be 'standard' for want of a better term. Your assumptions could well be correct, and you may be onto the right path. Thanks.
 
Your equation should really be written as

\sum_{j=0}^5 k_j x^{l_j}y^{m_j} =0

Since the values of k, l and m all depend on the value of j.

...as for the best method of solving this; give me a moment to think about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K