Determining best method for volumes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Volumes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the best method for calculating volumes of solids of revolution using integration. Participants explore various methods such as the disk method, washer method, and shell method, considering their applicability based on the axis of revolution and the shape of the object.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss factors influencing the choice of method, including the axis of revolution and the specific functions defining the boundaries. Questions arise about what characteristics of the shape might suggest one method over another.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about the conditions under which different methods may be preferable. Some guidance has been offered regarding the simplicity of the integral as a deciding factor, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the choice of method may depend on the specific characteristics of the functions involved and the axis of revolution, but there is no explicit consensus on a singular best method. The conversation reflects a variety of interpretations and considerations without resolving the question posed.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



No specific question but what is the best way to determine which method is the best for solving for volumes (using integration) of shapes as they revolve around axis/lines. disk method? washer method? shell method? other?

what exactly do you look for that may hint towards one method over the other?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what axis they're revolving.
 
Which is better depends not only about which axis they are revolving but also the specific form of the functions describing the boundaries. About the only thing one can say in general is to consider each and decide which gives the simplest integral.
 
well you only have two axis, right? if its x which is best? if its y which is best?
 
to do volume with calculus: whether you chop the object up into thin disks or thin shells depends highly on the shape of the object. eg: consider the area under the graph e^(-x) and x in [1,2], if vol. is formed by revolving this area about x axis, then disk method is the natural choice, whereas if revolved about y axis, then shell method would be better.
 
why? what made you pick one over the other? what specifics do you look for that would cause you to lean towards one method over the other?
 
Because one of the methods is easier than the other. In certain situations, the shell method is easier to do than the disk method.

And we all know mathematicians are lazy. ;)

Think about it this way: if you were to find the area of a cone (y = x) that revolved around the x-axis, you'ld use the disk method. Not saying that you can't use the shell method, but its just easier to use disk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K