What is the best way to defrag a hard drive and what are the potential risks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the process of defragmenting a hard drive, particularly in the context of Windows Vista. Participants explore the methods for defragging, the time it typically takes, the potential benefits, and the risks associated with the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about how to defrag a hard drive and the potential gains from doing so, expressing concerns about data damage or system malfunctions.
  • Another participant describes the steps to defrag a drive in Windows Vista and notes that the time taken can vary based on the drive's usage and fragmentation level.
  • Some participants mention that defragging may not be necessary for systems like Windows XP and suggest that the benefits depend on usage patterns, such as frequent program installations or updates.
  • There are suggestions to run additional maintenance tasks, such as ScanDisk and Disk Cleanup, before defragging to mitigate risks of data loss or corruption.
  • One participant argues that defragging is generally safe, stating that data is copied and verified before deletion, thus minimizing the risk of data loss.
  • Another participant mentions the use of third-party defragging tools, which may offer faster performance compared to the built-in Windows defragmenter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views regarding the necessity and safety of defragging. While some argue that it can improve performance, others caution about potential risks and suggest that it may not be needed for all systems. No consensus is reached on the overall necessity of defragging or the extent of its benefits.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various factors that influence the effectiveness and safety of defragging, including the operating system, the amount of free space, and the frequency of maintenance tasks. There are also mentions of differing opinions on the necessity of defragging for different Windows versions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for users of Windows Vista or other operating systems who are considering defragmentation, as well as those interested in understanding the maintenance of hard drives and the associated risks.

The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I would like to know how to "defrag" a hard drive, and what the gains are to doing so. I am using windows vista home premium 64-bit with a single hard disk installed into my computer. Where do I go to defrag my drive? How long does this take? Are there any potential risks of causing data damage or hardware/software malfunction by defragging?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
In my computer, right click on the drive, select properties->tools and defrag.
Then select the drive again and click defrag, takes 10-30mins
Depedning on how full your drive is and what you use it for, it can make a big difference.
 
The_Absolute said:
How long does this take? Are there any potential risks of causing data damage or hardware/software malfunction by defragging?
Depending on your operating system and how much defragging you need, a first time can take hours. When I got XP I was told I no longer needed to do a regular defrag.

If there is a problem yes, defragging can hose you up.

Yep, Just looked it up, here you go. He's also correct about running a scandisk first. We also deleted temp files through DOS.

Post 6

Defrag is less necessary on XP systems. But still useful.

Frequent Defrag does not help system speed that much, unless you do a lot of program installing and removing, or you use programs with large databases that get updated a lot. How much it helps depends on how you use the system. If you are getting ready to install or remove several programs or update a lot of files, then it is useful to do a scandisk and defrag both before and after.

Your expert may be concerned about disk read/write errors showing up during a Defrag and causing problems, or file system errors causing problems. This is why you should at least run ScanDisk first in normal mode, and if it has not been ran for several months, run ScanDisk in Thorough mode (takes hours) before doing the Defrag.

The second concern, if there are a lot of file system errors and you let ScanDisk fix them, it can corrupt files that are otherwise useable.

But if you run ScanDisk and Defrag weekly, these types of errors should not build up to the point that they can not be safely fixed automatically by Scandisk. It is often useful to run the Disk CleanUp utility also, after running ScanDisk, as it cleans out some temporary files and allows you to run Defrag quicker.

The Microsoft Maintance Wizard sets up ScanDisk, Disk CleanUp and Defrag as scheduled tasks. So that is a clue that you really need to run all three programs. However, it is best to run them manually when you have the time and not use the scheduled task.

http://www.computing.net/answers/windows-me/is-defrag-necessary/44453.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My two cents:)

I would like to know how to "defrag" a hard drive,

Prior to a defrag its good to run diskcleanup and chkdsk. Note that the Windows defragger needs atleast 15% free space to defrag. In Vista, the defragmenter is set to defrag on a specified schedule (I think 1pm on Wednesdays IIRC) and it lacks the fragmentation visuals as in the XP defragger. You can access the Disk defragger from Start>Accessories>SystemTools>Disk defragmenter. Another option is to go in for a completely automatic defragger like Diskeeper which once set in real time, defrags automatically even as you use the PC when its idle. (It also defrags in <15% free space)

what the gains are to doing so.

Defragging speeds up data access, so the HDD works more efficiently and contributes to overall system speed, preventing slowdowns.

How long does this take?
That normally depends on how fragmented the drive is, how much free space you have and what defrag program you run. Typically the more often you defrag, each time it shouldn't take more than afew minutes.

Are there any potential risks of causing data damage or hardware/software malfunction by defragging?
I personally haven't heard of or experienced any problems during or after a defrag.( I run DK in the automatic mode) However its a good precaution to ensure there is no power outage during the process. In anycase, its always good to have a backup of important files. Besides that there isn't anything to worry about.
 
I use 2 hard drives, each with multiple partitions and a 2 instances of the OS installed to peform a backup, compare, format, restore, compare sequence on partitions to backup, defrag them. Each instance of the OS can back up the partition of the other OS. The boot partition, usually "C:" can't be easily formatted and restored because of the partition and boot sectors, so I leave that alone, and only keep a minimal amount of stuff in it. I use other paritions for the OS and yet other partitions for applications and data to make restoring an OS partition faster (less data to restore).
 
The_Absolute said:
what the gains are to doing so

Disks are divided into physical entities called sectors. These sectors take only a limited amount of data, say 2048 bytes (it varies somewhat). The files you have are usually much larger than a 2048 bytes though, which means your file is spread out among multiple sectors. Now, if these sectors are not continuous (as in the first part of the file is on sector A, the next part on sector B, and so on), the disk will have to spend time seeking a new sector for each 2048 bytes its want to read.

So, defragging is the process of reading files and rewriting them, making sure that they are stored continuously. This way, no time is spent seeking when you read a file, and access to the data on the disk is much faster.

Modern OSes and file-systems do a pretty good job of building these continuous files on the fly, but over time the data will still become fragmented. So once in a while you want to run defrag.

The_Absolute said:
Are there any potential risks of causing data damage or hardware/software malfunction by defragging?

It is not dangerous at all. Data being moved is only copied at first, then read back, and when it is confirmed readable from the new location, the pointers are updated and the original deleted. You are just as likely to loose data when you move a file as you are when you defrag.

k
 
There is a free disk defragger from AusLogics which is much faster than that supplied by Windows. You can get it from CNET.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
10K