What is the charge density of the wire?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge density of a long charged straight wire using the kinetic energy and potential energy relationship of a charged particle. The particle, with a charge of +2e and mass 6.70E-27 kg, experiences a change in speed from 2.20E+5 m/s at a distance of 1.61 cm to 4.00E+6 m/s at 4.01 cm from the wire. The electric field (E) is defined as E=lambda/(2pi*r*e0), and the potential energy change is equated to the change in kinetic energy. Integration of the electric field along the path of the charge is necessary to find the electrostatic potential (V).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically electric fields generated by charged wires.
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (U) concepts.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in physics, particularly in relation to electric fields.
  • Basic understanding of charge properties, including charge quantization (e.g., +2e).
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive the electric field from a long charged wire using Gauss's Law.
  • Study the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in electrostatic systems.
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating potential energy from electric fields.
  • Investigate the concept of charge density (lambda) and its implications in electrostatics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric fields and energy transformations in charged systems.

hanagasumi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
1. Consider a long charged straight wire that lies fixed and a particle of charge +2e and mass 6.70E-27 kg. When the particle is at a distance 1.61 cm from the wire it has a speed 2.20E+5 m/s, going away from the wire. When it is at a new distance of 4.01 cm, its speed is 4.00E+6 m/s.



2. What is the charge density of the wire?



3. I attempted to do this question but had no idea how would I approach this, I thought:
1) I find total KE by using 1/2(mv^2+mv'^2), and this KE is equivalent to the -U of the system,
2)I know that dU=Q*dV
3) dV= - (integral) E*ds, but I'm not sure which distance I should use.
4)I know that E=lambda/(2pi*r*e0)

Then I have no idea how should I interconnect my information, and I'm confused if about the change in KE and U, and the actualy KE and U. Also, if we are supposed to integrate this, I don't know how to define the upper and lower limit for the function.

Can anyone please help me? I'm really confused on how to do this question.


Thank you very much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case the potential energy lost by the charge will be equal to its change in kinetic energy.

You know the electric field due to a long straight wire, it might help you to find the electrostatic potential V. You've written down how it relates to E, it means integrating the E field along a line.

What do you think would be an appropriate line to integrate along? Think about how the charge is moving away from the wire! (It starts a some distance 'a' away from the wire, then is found again a new distance 'b' away).
 
JesseC said:
In this case the potential energy lost by the charge will be equal to its change in kinetic energy.

You know the electric field due to a long straight wire, it might help you to find the electrostatic potential V. You've written down how it relates to E, it means integrating the E field along a line.

What do you think would be an appropriate line to integrate along? Think about how the charge is moving away from the wire! (It starts a some distance 'a' away from the wire, then is found again a new distance 'b' away).

Thank you so much! I'm kind of getting this now, I'll go try it again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K