What is the cheapest option for a high altitude balloon altimeter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tackyattack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Altitude Balloon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the most cost-effective methods for measuring the altitude of high-altitude balloons, focusing on the feasibility of various sensors and techniques at near-space altitudes. Participants explore options including barometric sensors and GPS, while considering the limitations and potential errors associated with these methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that GPS may not be suitable for high-altitude balloons due to restrictions related to altitude and speed, while others argue that certain GPS devices can function at high altitudes or speeds, but not both simultaneously.
  • Barometric sensors are proposed as a potential solution, though some participants express uncertainty about their effectiveness at near-space altitudes, with one noting a specific sensor's limitations in pressure range.
  • One participant raises the idea of using temperature as an alternative method for estimating altitude, questioning its viability.
  • Another participant references a specific Honeywell device that claims to operate at nearly vacuum pressure levels, suggesting it could be a suitable option, while also noting that the existing code and layout for a related project are available.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of pressure-based altitude measurements at high altitudes, with references to sources of error and the diminishing resolution of pressure changes as altitude increases.
  • One participant mentions that while the main equation for altitude based on pressure may hold at high altitudes, practical limitations in resolution could affect its effectiveness for precise measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the suitability of different measurement methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach. There are competing views on the effectiveness of GPS and barometric sensors at high altitudes, as well as uncertainty about the use of temperature as an altitude estimate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential inaccuracy of pressure measurements at high altitudes due to reduced resolution and the dependence of results on specific sensor characteristics. The discussion also highlights the need for careful design considerations when using these sensors in high-altitude applications.

tackyattack
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
What would be the cheapest option to measure the altitude of a near space balloon? I know GPS can't be used because it is restricted to work below a certain point.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't have much knowledge on taking measurements at near space so maybe a barometric sensor can't even be used that high but if it can then probably something like this would be my guess. This one even includes the temp measurement you'll need. Sparkfun has many useful sensors for the hobbyist.

http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9694
 
es1 said:
I don't have much knowledge on taking measurements at near space so maybe a barometric sensor can't even be used that high but if it can then probably something like this would be my guess. This one even includes the temp measurement you'll need. Sparkfun has many useful sensors for the hobbyist.

http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9694


It looks like that one only goes down to about 300 hPa, which translates to a maximum altitude of 30,052 feet.
 
I don't know if GPS is suitable for high altitude balloons for other reasons, but they aren't restricted from working above a certain altitude. They are restricted from working above a certain altitude and a certain speed, ie, at the same time (the reason is to prevent their use on ICBMs). That being said, I know some GPS manufacturers have implemented this as an either or situation, but there are some GPS's that will function at either a very high altitude or very high speed (just not both at once).
 
DaleSwanson said:
but there are some GPS's that will function at either a very high altitude or very high speed (just not both at once).

I don't really have any way of finding that out so would temperature work as an altitude estimate?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DragonPetter said:
What about this device?
http://datasheet.octopart.com/ASDX015A24R-Honeywell-datasheet-29814.pdf

The example to use it is here. He says it goes down to nearly vacuum pressure levels.
http://www.thefintels.com/aer/atom_altimeter.htm

I would maybe use a different chip if I were him, but he has the code and layout done already.

Cool!
Could temperature be used as an estimate for altitude?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you'll want to read this link. I found it really interesting and it discusses many of the sources of error when using pressure to determine altitude.

http://www.biber.fsnet.co.uk/altim.html

But I was wondering if the main equation, z = (RT/gM).loge(po/p), even still holds at near space? Surely it can't work for all heights above sea level, i.e. one couldn't tell the difference between 1/3 of the way to the moon and 2/3 of the way to the moon with this technique, no? In the wikipedia article they mention using radar instead (which is probably not cheap)

But maybe for a course measurement (say +-25%) at near space it is still reasonable...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just read DragonPetter's link and it has a blurb which hints and what height is practical to measure with the pressure sensor based on change in resolution, no mention of accuracy though. But obviously with reduced resolution comes reduced absolute accuracy in a real sensor.

It also implies the equation z = (RT/gM).loge(po/p) holds all the way to space.

"The altimeter would actually work all the way to space (vacuum), and still deploy. The problem when you start getting above 40 or 50 thousand feet is the resolution goes down significantly. The change in pressure per foot gets less and less the higher you go. By the time you get to 100,000', you may have to drop 1,000' before the altimeter detects enough change in pressure to fire the apogee charge. So if you plan to use this at high altitudes, make sure you design the recovery system with high speed deployment in mind."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K