tackyattack
- 56
- 0
What would be the cheapest option to measure the altitude of a near space balloon? I know GPS can't be used because it is restricted to work below a certain point.
The discussion revolves around the most cost-effective methods for measuring the altitude of high-altitude balloons, focusing on the feasibility of various sensors and techniques at near-space altitudes. Participants explore options including barometric sensors and GPS, while considering the limitations and potential errors associated with these methods.
Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the suitability of different measurement methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach. There are competing views on the effectiveness of GPS and barometric sensors at high altitudes, as well as uncertainty about the use of temperature as an altitude estimate.
Limitations include the potential inaccuracy of pressure measurements at high altitudes due to reduced resolution and the dependence of results on specific sensor characteristics. The discussion also highlights the need for careful design considerations when using these sensors in high-altitude applications.
es1 said:I don't have much knowledge on taking measurements at near space so maybe a barometric sensor can't even be used that high but if it can then probably something like this would be my guess. This one even includes the temp measurement you'll need. Sparkfun has many useful sensors for the hobbyist.
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9694
DaleSwanson said:but there are some GPS's that will function at either a very high altitude or very high speed (just not both at once).
DragonPetter said:What about this device?
http://datasheet.octopart.com/ASDX015A24R-Honeywell-datasheet-29814.pdf
The example to use it is here. He says it goes down to nearly vacuum pressure levels.
http://www.thefintels.com/aer/atom_altimeter.htm
I would maybe use a different chip if I were him, but he has the code and layout done already.