I What is the Concept of Velocity and Acceleration in General Relativity?

AngPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am hoping someone can clarify some confusion I have. It is my understanding that there is no such thing as absolute velocity or acceleration in GR. If one observer is moving near the speed of light and the other is stationary each observer will see the other as in motion. But if they each throw a ball away from themselves the observer in motion, from my understanding, has a much larger gravitational potential than the observer at rest so their would be a feature that distinguishes between their "velocities".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AngPhysics said:
It is my understanding that there is no such thing as absolute velocity or acceleration in GR.
While there is no absolute velocity, there is the concept of proper acceleration. This is the acceleration experienced by an observer following a particular world line and is invariant.

The same is true in SR.

AngPhysics said:
from my understanding, has a much larger gravitational potential
Your understanding is wrong. The concept of relativistic mass does not apply to gravitation and how GR couples the metric to matter content. The correct statement is significantly more complicated. I suggest reading my insight article on relativistic mass, which is an obsolete concept not used by most physicists today.
 
  • Like
Likes AngPhysics
Thank you for the direction!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top