What is the concept of work in physical science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisas95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The concept of work in physical science is defined as the transfer of energy when a force acts on an object over a distance, mathematically expressed as work = force × distance. This relationship is crucial because it quantifies how energy is added to a system, with work measured in joules. The discussion clarifies that force alone, or force applied over time without movement, does not constitute work, emphasizing the importance of motion in the work-energy relationship. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping fundamental physics principles, including energy transfer and the relationship between work and kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with units of measurement: joules, newtons, kilograms, and meters
  • Concept of energy and its forms, particularly kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of impulse and momentum in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between work and kinetic energy in detail
  • Learn about impulse and momentum, and how they relate to work
  • Explore the concept of power and its mathematical relationship to work
  • Investigate real-world applications of work in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

High school students studying physical science, educators seeking to explain fundamental physics concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in physical systems.

  • #31
Redbelly98 said:
Yes.
While zero net work is done on the object, different muscles are all doing work, so you will get tired. The sum of the work done by all the muscles involved is still zero.
I'll concede this point, based on rcgldr's and Russ's posts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
"just put it this way, just imagine when you are holding an object while you are walking that object experiences a lot of external forces acting on it and the sum of those forces or what we call the net force would be zero because the forces that are acting on it are like strings that holds up that object just like a puppet where in if you view it as a particle [spherical in shape] all the forces are well distributed in all parts of the surface area of that object. from the study of vectors, taking the sum of them all [all the vectors] would eventually result to zero."

-R. Laride
 
  • #33
Redbelly98 said:
The short answer I tell people is: doing work on an object is how we change it's kinetic energy.

Here I am talking about the total (or net) work done by the net force acting on an object. As long as the object moves while a nonzero net force acts on it, it will either speed up or slow down (have a change in its kinetic energy).

We can also talk about the work done by individual forces, even if the net force does zero work.

only oin few cases we change ke... in cases where we take even the 2-d and 3-d (rarely) in consideration, then , even the p.e changes.. and the change is represented as a func of displacement (s) or instantaneous time (t) or variable force [F(t)] etc. also momentum changes.. obviously..
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K